PTO Belts
#1
Posted 11 June 2014 - 07:19 PM
#2
Posted 11 June 2014 - 09:49 PM
Snowy Ferries, on 11 June 2014 - 07:19 PM, said:
On Doppelmayr there is different shaft sizes from the pulley to the tires.
On Leitner Poma there is different gear sizes all the way around the terminal.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Hope this helps!
#3
Posted 12 June 2014 - 04:03 AM
Poma, Doppelmayr, CTEC (Garaventa), Leitner, and so forth all use the same principle to move carriers through the terminal. Each tire is connected to its neighbours by a belt or two. The pulleys are different sizes depending on whether the tire needs to be going slower or faster than the next one.

Where the manufacturers differ is how the tires in the contour are powered. This is where Poma uses the beveled gears you're referring to. CTEC and Doppelmayr use belts with angled pulleys, and I've seen Garaventa use tiny little drive shafts with u-joints and individual gearboxes (not sure if they put that setup into the export CTEC hybrids at all).

Technically when you refer to PTO belts you're talking about the big belts that transfer power from the PTO sheaves to the tire banks.

There you go.
(photo credits to remontees-mecaniques.net, except the last one which is mine)
#4
Posted 12 June 2014 - 04:25 AM
Attached File(s)
-
chondola acceljpeg.jpg (27.76K)
Number of downloads: 100 -
conveyer drawing.png (252.91K)
Number of downloads: 99
#5
Posted 12 June 2014 - 08:20 AM
mechanism pto assembly MARK UP.jpg (1.64MB)
Number of downloads: 77
So here's how it works. The Haul Rope drives the PTO Sheaves which in turn drive the PTO Belts which turn the 2 input sheaves (not marked) which turn the V Belt Pulleys which are connected to the Traction Tires that act on the Traction Plate on top of each carriers grip. As you can see the V Belt Pulleys are different diameters.
If the carrier is arriving from the right of the photo the first few traction tires will be running at "line speed" (say 1000 fpm). Once the grip opens and is no longer on the cable the traction tires will decelerate the carrier at a designed rate through the use of ratios (different diameters) to "station speed" (usually @ 200 fpm). After the carrier passes through the contour or turn around it will be accelerated back to "line speed" where it will be coupled onto the cable.
You can see from this arrangement that everything is synchronous with the speed of the haul rope.
Hope this answers your question.
Dino
#7
Posted 12 June 2014 - 03:36 PM
#9
Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:20 PM
snowmaster, on 15 June 2014 - 12:54 PM, said:
On older lifts it was done as you has described in the early 90s almost all the lift manufacturers switched to a PTO sheave belt arrangement to power the conveyor systems on detachable lifts. Slippage can be an issue that is why the tension on the belts is checked by maintenance and operations personnel regularly.
#10
Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:36 PM
snowmaster, on 15 June 2014 - 12:54 PM, said:
One terminal (return) has no drive, it only has the haul rope driving the pto sheaves, that drive the pto belts, that drive the tire conveyor. This is much less expensive, less clumsy, and way faster to repair than gearboxes and shafts. There's no point in driving the drive station any differently.
#11
Posted 16 June 2014 - 10:17 AM
snowmaster, on 15 June 2014 - 12:54 PM, said:
If you ever get to Vail, take a good look at some of the older Doppelmayr lifts on the front side. There are driveshafts, gearboxes, pulleys, belts and cogs. The PTO system greatly simplifies how a terminal is powered.
If you worked on both types you would see what we are talking about.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 16 June 2014 - 10:18 AM
#12
Posted 16 June 2014 - 04:16 PM
https://www.youtube....h?v=_YXzFH9l8EU
This video that I took myself shows the inside of the terminal of the Kaatskill Flyer at Hunter Mountain. It has the terminal powered by PTO sheaves.
https://www.youtube....h?v=XT9rQRD0QrQ
Both videos are taken at the drive end which is the bottom on both lifts. The Stratton Gondola is a vault drive while the Kaatskill Flyer is obviously an overhead drive.
This post has been edited by snoloco: 16 June 2014 - 04:20 PM
#13
Posted 16 June 2014 - 06:30 PM


You can see how many moving parts and subsystems there are to take care of. While this eliminates the slippage some of you have mentioned, there is much more to maintain and inspect. I'm actually doing this service now, and it takes me on average two days longer than the guys with PTO-belt-driven lifts.
photo credit to remontees-mecaniques.net
#15
Posted 17 June 2014 - 12:00 PM
#16
Posted 17 June 2014 - 12:46 PM
Attached File(s)
-
k126.jpg (48.76K)
Number of downloads: 104
Liftblog.com
#17
Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:59 PM
Peter, on 17 June 2014 - 12:46 PM, said:
Those are cog belts. My '92 Poma quad has them...VERY temperamental and usually good for snapping one a season. How they work (at least on mine) is the #1 incoming PTO powers tires 1-8, #2 incoming PTO powers tires 9-33, #1 outgoing PTO runs 34-58, and #2 outgoing does 59-66. The picture of the Skyship one has the Emergency Belt in place, which ties one entire sides conveyor together. It's the belt between the two that makes an upside down "V" and is easily installed if one of the two PTO belts snaps and can run the remainder of the day.
#18
Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:50 PM
#19
Posted 17 June 2014 - 07:07 PM
snoloco, on 17 June 2014 - 12:00 PM, said:
The photos I posted are at the return end. The bullwheel provides the driving power. You can see a shaft between the fixed column and a gearbox on the carriage. Because of the sliding coupling on the square shaft, it doesn't matter where the bullwheel is there either.
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












