90 Degree Loads and Unloads
#1
Posted 20 January 2014 - 11:37 PM
A lot of you all talk about 90 degree loads causing problems. I have never seen why they would cause problems, but the 2 lifts I have skied a lot that do 90 degree load, Sugarloaf (Alta) and Peruvian (Snowbird) are both used much more by experienced skiers. I also thought that it would be worth asking if 90 degree unloads, used at Snowbird on half the HSQs, cause trouble in your experience. In summary, does the 90 degree load/unload cause trouble, and if so why?
Thanks!
#2
Posted 21 January 2014 - 08:16 AM
Loading doesn't seem to be a problem either, since it's becoming pretty common on new lifts. Gooseneck turns seem to create more trouble for inexperienced skiers.
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
#3
Posted 21 January 2014 - 10:18 AM
#4
Posted 21 January 2014 - 07:42 PM
90 degree loading is used on the Rose Bowl Express lift and the Birds of Prey Express lift. 90 degree unloading is used on the Lower Beaver Creek Mountain Express lift because it is situated in a tight spot, between the bottom terminal of the Upper Beaver Creek Mountain Express lift and the lift line of the Bachelor Gulch Express lift.
Vail:
90 degree loading is used on the Highline Express lift and on the new Mountaintop Express lift. On the Highline Express, it's kind of necessary due to the location of the bottom terminal. On the Mountaintop Express, they could've gone with in-line loading, but they wanted to use the loading carpet system.
The Sourdough Express lift had 90 degree loading from 2007 to 2010. It was converted to inline loading so that people coming from Patrol Headquarters could ski right into the line from the Timberline Catwalk without having to make a tight gooseneck turn.
Breckenridge:
The Imperial Express SuperChair has 90 degree loading and unloading like the Kaatskill Flyer. In both cases, it's kind of a necessity due to both terminals' locations. The bottom terminal is located on rocky terrain where in-line loading would require an extensive wooden platform, not to mention that there is the storage rail. The upper terminal is built almost into the side of the steep face at the top of Peak 8, and 90 degree unloading is necessary because there is no room for in-line unloading.
Quicksilver Super6, being a double loading six pack, has 90 degree loading.
The Peak 8 SuperConnect used to have 90 degree loading at the bottom terminal (at the junction of Red Rover and Sundown) until this season, when they converted it to in-line loading, most likely to reduce stops and slows caused by misloads. However, they did not alter the speed of the contour, meaning the chair comes at you pretty fast when you reach the new location of the loading line. Also, the overhang with the loading directions marking the original location of the loading gates, still exists.
The Independence SuperChair was originally built with 90 degree loading at the bottom terminal. When they extended the lift downhill in 2008 to connect to Grand Lodge on Peak 7, the Crystal Peak Lodge, and the gondola, they converted the lift from 90 degree loading to in-line loading so that they could add a second queue line. Of the current six packs, only the Kensho SuperChair was built with inline loading to begin with, and I think the Colorado SuperChair might also feature it when it is upgraded next year.
Keystone:
The Ruby Express lift has a 90 degree loading with gates.
This post has been edited by DonaldMReif: 22 January 2014 - 07:35 AM
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome
#5
Posted 21 January 2014 - 11:05 PM
snoloco, on 21 January 2014 - 10:18 AM, said:
So it seems to me that the problem is that the lift isn't straight for long enough and is moving too fast, which is not helped by the 90 degree load, but is something that could potentially be averted.
#7
Posted 05 February 2014 - 01:13 PM
Here's a blurry picture that shows the summit lodge from the Bluebird.
Unload Area.JPG (1.77MB)
Number of downloads: 65
#8
Posted 05 February 2014 - 08:19 PM
Dino
#10
Posted 06 February 2014 - 06:35 AM
I would expect that if it's caled 'tangential loading' then what goes on at the top would be called 'tangential unloading'. Anyway, the blue chair is one of my favorites - it almost never stops since no beginner ever rides it a second time.
#11
Posted 06 February 2014 - 08:30 AM
#13
Posted 06 February 2014 - 10:01 PM
Walt Askier, on 06 February 2014 - 06:35 AM, said:
I would expect that if it's caled 'tangential loading' then what goes on at the top would be called 'tangential unloading'. Anyway, the blue chair is one of my favorites - it almost never stops since no beginner ever rides it a second time.
Believe it or not, I'v been to Nub's a few times. Preferred Yellow to Blue since it had better access to Scarface and Chute.
#14
Posted 07 February 2014 - 07:53 AM
The only reason Imperial must operate as a 90 degree loading lift is because A) it's low capacity and is meant for experienced skiers and riders only, and B) because of the location of the bottom terminal and the chair parking rails. As for the 90 degree unload at the top, it does feel a bit unusual your first time doing it because all other lifts on the rest of the mountain have forward unloading.
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome
#15
Posted 16 February 2014 - 07:14 PM
#16
Posted 02 March 2014 - 03:12 PM
#17
Posted 02 March 2014 - 03:45 PM
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome
#18
Posted 02 March 2014 - 06:55 PM
#19
Posted 11 March 2014 - 10:39 PM
DonaldMReif, on 21 January 2014 - 07:42 PM, said:
90 degree loading is used on the Rose Bowl Express lift and the Birds of Prey Express lift.
Rose Bowl actually has in line loading now. I'm not quite sure why they would have designed it for contour loading only to change it a year later.
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
#20
Posted 11 March 2014 - 10:42 PM
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














