Steamboat Grip Slip Incident
#1
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:16 AM
Story by Matt Stensland
Steamboat Pilot
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Steamboat Springs — An investigation has been completed into why a Priest Creek lift chair with two people on it lost its grip on the cable and slid backward Monday at Steamboat Ski Area.
Colorado Passenger Tramway Safety Board spokeswoman Cory Everett-Lozano said an inspector determined the chair slid because of a worn-out grip on the 40-year-old lift. The grip might have been jostled as it went through the lower terminal, she said.
Everett-Lozano said the ski area will inspect all the grips before operating the lift again. She said that should be done before spring break.
The incident happened near the lower terminal when a chair with two people on it slid a short distance on the steel cable but did not strike the chair behind it. The lift was stopped immediately and unloaded, and no one was injured.
In recent years, the lift has been used only during busing periods and as a backup.
Priest Creek is a 1972 Heron-Poma double.
Liftblog.com
#2
Posted 05 January 2013 - 10:20 AM
This post has been edited by boardski: 05 January 2013 - 10:25 AM
#3
Posted 05 January 2013 - 10:47 AM
boardski, on 05 January 2013 - 10:20 AM, said:
After posting something about Snowbird, I was remembering a similar incident a few years ago on Wilberie lift where they found out the haul rope was too stretched (diameter not thick enough). I wonder if this happend to PC? They ended up replacing all the chairs and rope (old chairs from Gad 1 were used) and replaced the rope on Gad 2. No injuries occurred during this incident either, just a surprised ski patroller when he or she unloaded the lift and the chair came off with him.
#5
Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:06 PM
boardski, on 05 January 2013 - 10:20 AM, said:
The article is misleading since it confuses the grip inspection sentence with the date the lift is expected to operate again.
Priest Creek is a secondary lift and according to another article Steamboat was not planning to operate it again until March.
#6
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:43 PM
vons, on 06 January 2013 - 10:11 AM, said:
I assume you're referring to Stagecoach ski area? Are those lifts still standing?
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
#7
Posted 06 January 2013 - 05:04 PM
This post has been edited by boardski: 06 January 2013 - 05:04 PM
#10
Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:56 PM
part of your annual NDT inspection should include a physical check of the grip. does the spring stack free length meet the minimum? install the grip on a mandrel sized at 94% of your rope nominal and check to see if the grip is bottomed out. you should know how to perform this check on all your grips, regardless of manufacture. how to perform this check on Heron grips is shown on the H-P grip drawing.
#11
Posted 07 January 2013 - 09:19 AM
"you should know how to perform this check on all of your grips, regardless of manufacture"- can you elaborate on where this requirement comes from?
Thanks-
Dino
#12
Posted 07 January 2013 - 05:15 PM
Lift Dinosaur, on 07 January 2013 - 09:19 AM, said:
Thanks-
Dino
Perhaps this quote sounds a bit arrogant, but I agree with the basic principle.
If you don't understand the basic workings of the mechanism you are maintaining, then you should relinguish your responsibility a more qualified mechanic. (Or ask for assistance).
Ignorance is replaced with experience... we all have to start somewhere. (But someone appears to have dropped the ball on this particular lift).
#13
Posted 07 January 2013 - 05:47 PM
i have a partial print showing a cross-sectional view of a 1972 heron triple grip. that view shows that a gap between the insert and grip body must be maintained when the grip is properly tensioned on the rope. this ensures that the grip is not "bottomed out" when installed. b77 stiplulates a minimum diameter of 94% from nominal. a nice check before installation on the rope would be placing each of your NDT sample group on a correctly sized mandrel.
the print also shows the minimum free length of the spring stack to be 3.94 inches (triple grip). broken washers are not allowed. also shown on the print are hints about proper fit-up of insert to the body, proper lubrication, etc.
if using his equipment, am sure mr ellis of superior tram will provide you with any technical help you need.
i'll refrain from further, unrelated comments.
#14
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:33 AM
secondly- grip pull testing- this is a very good test if done properly. be careful if a hydraulic or pneumatic tester is being used and be sure it is acting on the grip properly-not at an angle. sometimes the simple hoist and dynomometer may be better. just my .02 PS those Heron-Pomas were well built machines.
#15
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:14 AM
- Grips NDT'd at 20% per year
- Rope size is above minimum allowable
- Spring pack measured at 3.94"
- Plunger not bottomed out
- Grips are relocated and painted every year as well as slip tested
- Chair ran three days with a full load before incident
- No migration was detected before incident, fourth day of operation for the season.
Pictures and info will be posted in the SORT forum once investigation is complete.
#16
Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:24 PM
#17
Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:55 AM
Thanks for your response. My drawing shows checking for the gap on a nominal sized mandrel before installing on the rope. I did not correlate that to the 94% reduction from nominal since B77 also requires the design to incorporate provisions to accommodate a 10% reduction in haul rope diameter. I re-read where you said "should" - I thought I was missing a 'requirement'.
Dino
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











