High Speed Lifts
Started by ISMrider, May 08 2004 03:50 PM
31 replies to this topic
#4
Posted 09 May 2004 - 07:46 PM
Tube, or pipe steel, towers are definitely the less expensive and more practical method. However, when one has a lift that needs a very tall tower, the open-lattice construction is better in terms of rigidity and strength. It's not a chairlift, but Ajax's Silver Queen six-passenger gondola has almost exclusively lattice towers due to their height (in excess of 25 metres).
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.
#6
Posted 09 May 2004 - 08:22 PM
Yan did that as well, only he had the fabrication equipment mounted on a trailer and did it on site. He'd set up in the parking lot and, with profile in hand for numbers, begin pumping out towers. His welders then attached the tower caps right there.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.
#8
Posted 09 May 2004 - 08:43 PM
Giant steel ones :---: I think ANSI or OSHA got on him about the field-fabrication process and forced him to move it back to the factory because of quality-control issues. Of course, he had those in the factory as well, so I don't know if that was any better.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.
#13
Posted 11 May 2004 - 10:11 AM
I just read your discussion about towers of high speed lifts so I decided to join and registered. In Switzerland there are some high speed lifts which don't have tube towers. At the attachment (the rights are by M. Meyer) you can see one with very strage towers (unique I guess) at Arosa. It is a HST built by Von Roll in the late 1980's. I have to search for some photos of other high speed lifts without tube towers, but I will find some soon. I hope I could help you.
Attached File(s)
-
arosa1.jpg (164.77K)
Number of downloads: 66
#15
Posted 11 May 2004 - 06:03 PM
Yan tower fabrication info –
90% of all the tower stock came from Japan. 40' lengths were a common size. True with most lift manufactures even today.
Spiral seam more common on longer lengths, also true with most manufactures.
Only cap/cross arm shoe and ladder rungs added in field on line towers.
Only side plates and bullwheel frames added to terminal towers.
40' tower with assemblies weighs around 5500 lbs.
Maximum weight that a Bell 214 can pick is about 5501 lbs.
Ryan B
90% of all the tower stock came from Japan. 40' lengths were a common size. True with most lift manufactures even today.
Spiral seam more common on longer lengths, also true with most manufactures.
Only cap/cross arm shoe and ladder rungs added in field on line towers.
Only side plates and bullwheel frames added to terminal towers.
40' tower with assemblies weighs around 5500 lbs.
Maximum weight that a Bell 214 can pick is about 5501 lbs.
Ryan B
www.ropetech.org
#16
Posted 12 May 2004 - 09:43 AM
Thank you for the nice welcome!
Here you can see another HST without tube towers. It's in Anzere, Switzerland. This lift has also an intermediate station.
The rights of the photo are by www.seilbahn.tk.
All of these lifts are allready about 10 years old. The new ones have almost always
tube towers.
Here you can see another HST without tube towers. It's in Anzere, Switzerland. This lift has also an intermediate station.
The rights of the photo are by www.seilbahn.tk.
All of these lifts are allready about 10 years old. The new ones have almost always
tube towers.
Attached File(s)
-
anzere4.jpg (63.46K)
Number of downloads: 60
#18
Posted 13 May 2004 - 04:21 AM
It would be interesting if PCMR put lattice towers on the new Town lift, whenever that would be (at least from the part you can see from the town) because the old mining tram had lattice towers that still stand next to the boring 80's CTEC tube towers.
Edit: I saved it as a JPEG, which really screws up the quality, and it's a little smaller than I would have planned. I don't really remember if the tower head design is right, or if CTEC builds depression sheaves attached to the terminal
Edit: I saved it as a JPEG, which really screws up the quality, and it's a little smaller than I would have planned. I don't really remember if the tower head design is right, or if CTEC builds depression sheaves attached to the terminal
Attached File(s)
-
town_jpeg.JPG (55.55K)
Number of downloads: 33
This post has been edited by floridaskier: 13 May 2004 - 04:22 AM
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
#20
Posted 13 May 2004 - 08:14 AM
@liftmech: SkiBachelor is right, it's a Von Roll. It was built in 1987 or 1988 and was the first high speed lift I ever rode. In the beginning there was only the lower section and some years later they added the upper section to replace an old double chair. Today it's one of the last HST's in Europe
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











