Jump to content


Chairlift footrests: Good or Bad?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
13 replies to this topic

Poll: Chairlift footrests (22 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like footrests on chairlifts?

  1. Yes (11 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. No (11 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 DonaldMReif

    Established User

  • Member
  • 1,980 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 10:01 AM

Personally, I do. I might as well also mention that the only lifts I've ridden in the past three years not to include footrests are triple and double chairlifts and Steamboat's Christie Peak Express.

Note: this is just a "your own opinion on chairlift footrests" thread. There is no right or wrong.

This post has been edited by DonaldMReif: 02 February 2011 - 11:31 AM

YouTube channel for chairlift POV videos and other random stuff:
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome

#2 Emax

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,904 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 11:05 AM

So?
This is a symposium of industry professionals - not end users.
There are three roads to ruin; women, gambling and technicians. The most pleasant is with women, the quickest is with gambling, but the surest is with technicians. Georges Pompidou

#3 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 11:34 AM

View PostEmax, on 02 February 2011 - 11:05 AM, said:

This is a symposium of industry professionals - not end users.

Actually, it's both.
- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#4 Nor'eastSkier

    Established User

  • Member
  • 67 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 12:17 PM

View PostSkier, on 02 February 2011 - 11:34 AM, said:

Actually, it's both.


I certainly hope that it's both, because I'm no industry professional.




#5 Emax

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,904 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 12:43 PM

I stand corrected. Have at it.

Bye
There are three roads to ruin; women, gambling and technicians. The most pleasant is with women, the quickest is with gambling, but the surest is with technicians. Georges Pompidou

#6 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 01:31 PM

I should clarify. There are three sets of forums, though not all are publicly viewable:

1. Society of Ropeway Technicians (SORT) - for industry professionals only
2. Outdoor Operations Forum - for industry professionals including ski patrol, instructors, lift operators.
3. Skilifts.org General Forums - For the general public
- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#7 Emax

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,904 Posts:

Posted 02 February 2011 - 01:44 PM

View PostSkier, on 02 February 2011 - 01:31 PM, said:

I should clarify. There are three sets of forums, though not all are publicly viewable:

1. Society of Ropeway Technicians (SORT) - for industry professionals only
2. Outdoor Operations Forum - for industry professionals including ski patrol, instructors, lift operators.
3. Skilifts.org General Forums - For the general public


I strongly suggest entirely separate URLs.
There are three roads to ruin; women, gambling and technicians. The most pleasant is with women, the quickest is with gambling, but the surest is with technicians. Georges Pompidou

#8 skierdude9450

    Established User

  • Member
  • 1,484 Posts:
  • Interests:Skiing, sailing, music.

Posted 03 February 2011 - 11:19 AM

Back on the subject, footrests are nice but essentially unnecessary. However I think that if you're going to have a safety bar on a lift, it might as well have a footrest too. I can see that there are certain situations which prohibit it (like low clearance in the mid-station of Christie Peak Express) but for other cases like Winter Park I don't see why many of their detachables don't have footrests, unless it's to maybe save a couple bucks. I personally don't use the footrest often but it's nice to have as an option. Probably the most comfortable combination can be found on the Solar Coaster and 7th Heaven lifts at Blackcomb with the headrests on the chair. Takes a load off your neck since you're naturally looking up the line. $0.02 Rant over.
-Matt

"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein

#9 DonaldMReif

    Established User

  • Member
  • 1,980 Posts:

Posted 03 February 2011 - 04:18 PM

Right. I also have that hard time understanding why all of the detachable lifts at Snowmass have foot rests with the exception of Coney Glade (other than that the resort must have decided not to start adding footrests until after it was built). At Winter Park, why the Gemini Express and Prospector Express lifts do not have footrests is understandable: they are short, and are beginners lifts. Preferably, I like footrests, and am okay with them not being on a lift, though I can't understand why a long lift like say the Zephyr Express (Winter Park) doesn't have footrests when it really should have them because of its length and amount of usage. The Eskimo Express lift, for that matter, is also long enough to justify footrests. Though, the footrests are nice on long lift rides like those on the Olympia Express and Pioneer Express lifts.

There are some lifts where I wonder why a resort bothered even putting footrests on the bars, like the incredibly short Sourdough Express at Vail. And it does seem to me that converting chairs without footrests to have footrests is simply a matter of changing out the bar. Case in point: the Sunshine Express lift at Steamboat. It has footrests now, but when it was the Tombstone Express lift at The Canyons, it didn't have them.


YouTube channel for chairlift POV videos and other random stuff:
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome

#10 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:02 AM

I don't like them purely because they're a pain in my @$$. I have to fix ten to twenty percent of them every summer, and they fall down, get hung up on the ramp, or cause mis-unloads from people failing to raise them. I grew up riding lifts before there were footrests on any of them (save the super-long chair 5 at Crystal) and I never got used to them when they showed up. (bear in mind I lived in a state with virtually no detachables to speak of until the late 90s/early 2000s).
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#11 zeedotcom

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 225 Posts:

Posted 05 February 2011 - 07:54 AM

I don't like the foot rests for a number of reasons. Beyond the basic maintenance headache, there is a safety issue. If two people are riding a triple with foot rests and one isn't lined up perfectly on the chair when the other yanks the bar down with no warning, there is a chance of it clearing without the foot rest arms. With the foot rests, someone is going to get hit in the head. Additionally, skis and snowboards are designed for use on snow, not to be shoved on a piece of metal and scraped up (park rats excluded). It is also less comfortable for snowboarders in a lot of cases.

For lifts with any sort of bar, I am partial to the straight, standard bar with no handles, foot rests, or anything else. Keep it simple. Of course, foot passengers and the requirements associated with them complicate this suggestion.

#12 DonaldMReif

    Established User

  • Member
  • 1,980 Posts:

Posted 05 February 2011 - 12:41 PM

View Postliftmech, on 04 February 2011 - 11:02 AM, said:

I don't like them purely because they're a pain in my @$$. I have to fix ten to twenty percent of them every summer, and they fall down, get hung up on the ramp, or cause mis-unloads from people failing to raise them. I grew up riding lifts before there were footrests on any of them (save the super-long chair 5 at Crystal) and I never got used to them when they showed up. (bear in mind I lived in a state with virtually no detachables to speak of until the late 90s/early 2000s).


Check out this video of the Rocky Mountain SuperChair:
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=zhfZK9gnqvs

If you look closely, you might notice that a few chairs have bent footrests. I've seen a few chairs on the Colorado SuperChair and Peak 8 SuperConnect that have very bent footrests.

Of course, what I like about footrests is that at least one can rest their foot after a very hard run.

This post has been edited by DonaldMReif: 05 February 2011 - 12:58 PM

YouTube channel for chairlift POV videos and other random stuff:
https://www.youtube....TimeQueenOfRome

#13 Bogong

    Established User

  • Member
  • 199 Posts:
  • Interests:Corrupting society, Australian ski history, Backcountry and resort skiing, mountaineering, extended hikes, making ski resorts viable summer destinations.

Posted 05 February 2011 - 05:38 PM

I think it depends on how long the lift is. When I'm skiing runs served by short and medium length lifts my legs don't get tired.

But if the lift is over 1,600 metres ( 1 mile) long and the runs are even longer, my legs get tried if I ski aggressively and then I really appreciate the footrests.
Details of every Australian ski lift ever built. http://www.australia...ralianskilifts/

#14 texasskier

    New User

  • Member
  • 5 Posts:

Posted 06 March 2011 - 06:54 PM

I think footrests should come standard on quads and six-packs. I think they look kind of wierd on doubles, like Mid-Gad, Gad 2, and Little Cloud at Snowbird.





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users