Jump to content


Lift Survey for Taos


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 nathanvg

    Established User

  • Member
  • 216 Posts:

Posted 20 October 2010 - 05:20 PM

I pulled together the following lift numbers that correspond to the lift survey on this site and figured I should share them. Also note that Taos is frequently misspelled in the survey.

65
2 - Toas N/A 2C Stadeli N/A 3380 1100 800 492
70
3 - Taos N/A 2C Stadeli N/A 570 120 1000 350
71
4 - Taos N/A 2C Pullman-Berry N/A 4205 1208 N/A 440
72
5 - Taos N/A 2C Stadeli N/A 4191 1670 1200 500
73
6 Toas N/A 2C Stadeli N/A 2793 955 1400 450
74
7 - Taos N/A 3C Stadeli N/A 3100 920 1800 470
89
1 - Taos Ski Valley Lift #1 4C Poma 480 3740 1634 2400 500
91
4 - Toas Ski Valley N/A 4C Poma 400 4533 1216 2400 500
92
8 - Taos N/A 4C Poma 400 4436 1230 2400 500
95
2- Toas N/A 4C Poma 400 3205 1066 1800 500

#2 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:15 PM

The current database has not been updated for a few years. Many of these mistakes are already fixed on the new version of Skilifts.org which is in development.
- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#3 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,038 Posts:

Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:18 PM

Do you have a problem with the lift stats or the spelling?
I'm missing the point of your post.....
Dino
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#4 nathanvg

    Established User

  • Member
  • 216 Posts:

Posted 20 October 2010 - 07:40 PM

The main point of my post was just to share the lift numbers (aka names) that where not identified in the survey listings data. (which lift is which) I hope that helps.

This post has been edited by nathanvg: 20 October 2010 - 07:42 PM


#5 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 20 October 2010 - 07:58 PM

Thanks, I'll check and make sure we have it right for the new site.
- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users