Drive Faults
#2
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:29 PM
#4
Posted 12 December 2008 - 07:12 AM
Kicking Horse, on Dec 11 2008, 06:57 PM, said:
What are the normal causes of a Drive Fault?
Power problem, motor problem, tach and/or coupling problem, motor lead problem, contactor problem, field supply problem, SCR problem, power problem, redundant saftey problem, dirty power problem, regulator problem, blower motor problem, bridge cooling fan problem, mice problem, etc. Did I mention a power problem?
What steps are taken to fix a Drive Fault?
Determine what the drive is telling you the problem is or any other annuciation if possible, then take the steps neccasary to correct that problem. Based on the list above, it can be many different ways to correct this.
If a lift resets and starts back up after a Drive Fault should a Techie be called to let them know?
Well, first the operator should be calling his tech before he resets anything (in the perfect world). Most drives I am fimilar with don't have easy ways to look back at the previous faults.
#5
Posted 12 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
Ski-lifts carry a bunch of people, at speed, up in the air. Fragile flesh & bone being carried aloft by a powerful rotating steel machine. Operators actions have consequences... such as
1) Your actions may result in uncontrolled acceleration / deceleration ... injury or death of passengers
2) Your actions result in significant damage to the machinery.
3) Your actions result in placing your employer as well as yourself in serious liability.
So why would you reset a drive fault unless you know exactly what the cause was, and what the consequences of a misguided reset/restart are.? Your operator manual should tell you to read the drive's fault display (before reseting) and immediately contact a maintenance person & inform them of the details of the fault. You should record the details of the drive fault concisely in the operator log. Let a qualified person make the decision on what to do.
CYA man!
#6
Posted 12 December 2008 - 04:27 PM
Alles touristen und non-technischen looken peepers! Das machinkontrol is nicht for gefengerpoken und mittengrabben. Oderwise is easy schnappen der springenverk, blowenfus, undpoppencorken mit spitzensparken. Der machine is diggen by experten only. Is nicht fur geverken by das dumpkopfen. Das rubber necken sightseenen keepen das cotton-picken hands in das pockets. So relaxen, und vatchen das blinkenlights.
I gotta remember this one!
Dino
#8
Posted 16 December 2008 - 10:26 AM
Your Northeastern US Representative
#9
Posted 25 December 2008 - 11:11 AM
#10
Posted 27 December 2008 - 07:49 AM
#11
Posted 27 December 2008 - 02:44 PM
I've since moved on to working in the mass-transit industry working on Light-rail vehicles but,
When I was still working at a local resort a couple of years ago as an operator, we learned that certain lifts had "personality traits" and we grew to recognize them.
Even though it was still protocol to call in lift faults, if a mechanic knew I was on a particular lift they would talk me through resets since they knew I was a little more on the ball than other operators. Most of the time faults were confined to minor spacing errors, false de-ropement proximity sensor errors and tower circuit faults. I was one of only a few operators who was trained how to pre-op a detachable-grip lift, knew how to move through the PLC control screens and adjust lift speeds based on authorizations from lift mechanics over the phone. Likewise mechanics usually were only at my lift to do AM/PM operating inspections, weekly APU checks and fault inspections.
There were a couple of faults that would come up but didn't stop the lift. These were usually spacing faults and didn't happen except on rare occasions.
All in all I think I grew a great appreciation for what it takes to make these machines work. I only wish that the diagnosis capabilities of the vehicles I now work on had the capabilities of most PLC driven lifts.
#12
Posted 28 December 2008 - 07:36 AM
Emax, on Dec 27 2008, 08:49 AM, said:
Perfect analogy Emax (I'm also a car guy).
#13
Posted 28 December 2008 - 08:52 AM
2milehi, on Dec 28 2008, 08:36 AM, said:
Is that a porta-pottie in the back of your pick-up?
How convenient!
#14
Posted 29 December 2008 - 06:17 PM
Emax, on Dec 27 2008, 08:49 AM, said:
Good analogy indeed
Goddamn check-engine light... comes on for god-knows what stupid reason... Our latest truck (Chevy), the "check engine" comes on when the wheels slip on ice, and needs to be reset by a Chevy mechanic with a diagnostics computer hooked up. My Toyota is smart enough to tell me there was a torque error. Chevy just tells me to check the goddamn engine.
And many ski-lifts (including very new) are not any better, with very poor annunciation of drive-faults. ie "user diag #27", which corresponds to a speed-deviation fault.... but yer just supposta know. And when there is a little power-bump... the drive fault display isn't much different. There is no effort to discriminate between a drive-fault which is operator-reset permissive, and a non-reset / non-permissive fault (ie, di/dt, tacho-loss, processor stall)
I love to rant... but maybe a general solution is possible.
M
#16
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:44 AM
mthornton, on Dec 29 2008, 09:17 PM, said:
Goddamn check-engine light... comes on for god-knows what stupid reason... Our latest truck (Chevy), the "check engine" comes on when the wheels slip on ice, and needs to be reset by a Chevy mechanic with a diagnostics computer hooked up. My Toyota is smart enough to tell me there was a torque error. Chevy just tells me to check the goddamn engine.
And many ski-lifts (including very new) are not any better, with very poor annunciation of drive-faults. ie "user diag #27", which corresponds to a speed-deviation fault.... but yer just supposta know. And when there is a little power-bump... the drive fault display isn't much different. There is no effort to discriminate between a drive-fault which is operator-reset permissive, and a non-reset / non-permissive fault (ie, di/dt, tacho-loss, processor stall)
I love to rant... but maybe a general solution is possible.
M
When I had my Toyota Tacoma a few years ago my Check Engine light was on all the time. If someone told me about it I would usually stop, open the hood, make sure that the engine was there and proceed to close the hood and continue on my way. Usually saying: "Engine.....Check"
OK, back on topic.
Your Northeastern US Representative
#17
Posted 28 February 2009 - 09:04 AM
#18
Posted 02 March 2009 - 08:39 AM
mthornton, on Dec 29 2008, 06:17 PM, said:
Goddamn check-engine light... comes on for god-knows what stupid reason... Our latest truck (Chevy), the "check engine" comes on when the wheels slip on ice, and needs to be reset by a Chevy mechanic with a diagnostics computer hooked up. My Toyota is smart enough to tell me there was a torque error. Chevy just tells me to check the goddamn engine.
And many ski-lifts (including very new) are not any better, with very poor annunciation of drive-faults. ie "user diag #27", which corresponds to a speed-deviation fault.... but yer just supposta know. And when there is a little power-bump... the drive fault display isn't much different. There is no effort to discriminate between a drive-fault which is operator-reset permissive, and a non-reset / non-permissive fault (ie, di/dt, tacho-loss, processor stall)
I love to rant... but maybe a general solution is possible.
M
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











