Cable Tach
#2
Posted 03 December 2008 - 01:45 PM
This post has been edited by Emax: 03 December 2008 - 01:47 PM
#4
Posted 05 December 2008 - 12:57 PM
#5
Posted 05 December 2008 - 01:07 PM
2milehi, on Dec 5 2008, 01:57 PM, said:
Are they also attempting to determine rope passage (in feet, meters, cubits) using this analog signal?
I don't understand why anyone uses a DC tach generator anymore. Perhaps it's an AC unit?
#6
Posted 05 December 2008 - 09:02 PM
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#7
Posted 05 December 2008 - 11:05 PM
Does anyone know any practical disadvantages of encoders (for new installations)?
MitchT, Pano
#8
Posted 06 December 2008 - 06:30 AM
Emax, on Dec 5 2008, 02:07 PM, said:
I don't understand why anyone uses a DC tach generator anymore. Perhaps it's an AC unit?
It is a DC tach - it goes into an analog input port on the PLC and yes the signal is used for rope speed, overspeed, and zero speed. The AB prox pulses that are used for anti-collision do not come in at a fast enough rate. There are 16.67 pulses per second from each AB prox (at 5 m/s) so there can be 16 to 18 pulses per second, depending on the phasing of the target. So right off the bat there is 6% error.
Here is the problem with trying to determine zero speed with AB proxs. Say we want to set the service brake at 0.3 m/s when the lift commanded to stop. At 0.3 m/s, there is 1 pulse per second, so it takes about a second to determine that speed. By then the lift has already come to a stop and may roll back before the service brake even sets.
One could use quadrature with the AB prox signal to increase the "events" to ~67 per second, but now the PLC's scan time is not fast enough to capture quadrature. So the next fix is to add a high-speed counter module and a capable PLC, but even 67 events per second yield 1.5% error, so another prox and "higher-count" target is added to give a better value.
Now I am not knocking encoders, I have done some upgrades with replacing a tachogenerator with an encoder on a DC motor. No maintenance, ability to run the lift at 0.1 m/s, and no concern of noise on the speed signal going to the drive is a great benefit. But the ABB drive was constructed with a high speed counter on board.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 06 December 2008 - 06:33 AM
#9
Posted 06 December 2008 - 06:40 AM
mthornton, on Dec 6 2008, 12:05 AM, said:
Does anyone know any practical disadvantages of encoders (for new installations)?
MitchT, Pano
The ABB drive has an analog output port that can generate a voltage proportional to speed and be scaled to 0 - 10 volts. Fine when running on electric, not so good when running on diesel.
As for disadvantages, use a bearingless encoder and make sure the encoder won't be tweaked by the magnetic fields of the DC motor.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 06 December 2008 - 06:41 AM
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











