Jump to content


Airplanes And Stuff.


  • Locked Topic This topic is closed
137 replies to this topic

#1 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:07 PM

What do you guys think about the new Boeing 7E7 Dreamliner?
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#2 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:09 PM

Here it is now:

Attached File(s)


- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#3 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:10 PM

And here's the original concept. Looks more like a 767 than this thing

Attached File(s)

  • Attached File  7e7.jpg (34.15K)
    Number of downloads: 36

- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#4 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:22 PM

i wont be riding one.
Jeff

#5 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:31 PM

whats so special?

#6 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:41 PM

Well, look at the concept. Really modern looking.

I guess Boeing thought it was too modern, so they went back to a more traditional design
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#7 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:45 PM

all their other planes work fine so that kind of a waste unless its has a new radical use

#8 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 04:51 PM

I think it's goign to replace the 767.

If they do that, all they'll have is:
-next-gen 737 (replaced old 737 and 757)
-7E7
-777
-aging 747
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#9 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 05:06 PM

i see
personnaly i prefer airbus's

#10 SilverFir

    New User

  • Member
  • 6 Posts:
  • Interests:I like to snowboard play computer games and race. I am also very interested in World WAR ll.

Posted 12 November 2003 - 07:49 PM

I also prefer the airbus, I think they fly smoother. Plus boeing already has enough good planes and the only thing that would benfit them in a new plane is if it were much faster.
Tim Venable

#11 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 12 November 2003 - 08:25 PM

that wont be happening soon. The concorde shows us why. The sonic boom is the main problem.

Boeing's replacement of the 747 seems to be the 777

The new plane seems kind of a waste, they should just upgrade the 767 with new engines, controls and a fly by wire system.
Zack

#12 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 12 November 2003 - 08:33 PM

I wonder if you can stop the sonic boom from happening. Maybe if they made the plane have a spoiler that would help, but who knows that might just cause disaster. I say a spolier because that would disrupt the air waves.
- Cameron

#13 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 09:07 PM

the sonic boom is inevitable
quietinging it is the only option

#14 CAski

    Established User

  • Member
  • 363 Posts:

Posted 12 November 2003 - 09:20 PM

Not only quieting it, but focusing it in another direction: upwards. It is possible to make the boom unheard on the ground due to a combination of these.
"Quo usque tandem abutere, Catalina, patientia nostra?" -Cicero

#15 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 14 November 2003 - 04:14 AM

The new 7E7 is supposed to be super-efficient, with a body made of composit materials. Who knows if it will be or not.
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#16 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 14 November 2003 - 06:38 AM

once the sonic boom isnt heard on the ground, and the jet engines become more efficient plane travel over mach 1 will be very common
Zack

#17 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 14 November 2003 - 02:41 PM

u guys are dreaming
Jeff

#18 Bill

    Founder

  • Administrator II
  • 2,852 Posts:

Posted 14 November 2003 - 02:58 PM

You wont be able to redirect a sonic boom, it is like a rock on a pond, the waves travel out in every direction.
- Bill


#19 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 15 November 2003 - 06:01 AM

That won't work. Like Bill said, it travels in every direction
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#20 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 15 November 2003 - 06:24 PM

damn, that sucks

the first object under human control to break the sound barier was a whip





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users