Fastest Detachable Quads in USA and Canada
#23
Posted 18 February 2007 - 06:29 PM
Anyone else know of different operating speed then the lift capacity listed in the SAM report?
#25
Posted 18 February 2007 - 08:32 PM
aug, on Feb 8 2007, 08:10 PM, said:
#27
Posted 21 February 2007 - 05:24 AM
catskills, on Feb 18 2007, 06:29 PM, said:
Anyone else know of different operating speed then the lift capacity listed in the SAM report?
Most lifts are not operated at their maximum speed at all times. At WB, our quads are all rated for 5m/s (1000fpm) but only operate at that speed on busy days. mostly we run at 4.2-4.6 m/s. (840-920fpm).
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#28
Posted 22 February 2007 - 07:24 PM
#29
Posted 23 February 2007 - 07:07 AM
catskills, on Feb 18 2007, 09:29 PM, said:
Anyone else know of different operating speed then the lift capacity listed in the SAM report?
I am not an engineer or a lift mechanic but one year I had chat with a lift operator who was running a high speed six pack chair. The chair was not being run at its max because the chair was brand new, (third day operational). Would you drive a brand new high speed sports car at max speed on an empty highway? Some people might but the car might be damaged in the process. I know that the manufacturer of the four wheel drive car I own intentionally detunes the engine and transmission for the first 24,000 kilometres until the engine is broken in a bit. After 24000 km, the engine management computer chips are reprogrammed to "tune" the engine for proper performance.
Same concept probably holds for ski lifts, run them slower than full speed for a while so the various parts can get used to working with each other. saves a bit of maintenance in the long term.
This post has been edited by andyh1962: 23 February 2007 - 07:08 AM
#30
Posted 23 February 2007 - 01:42 PM
I am sure their is a lot of fine tuning to get a ldetachable ift to operate at its maximum rated speed. There is definitely a lot more moving parts.
This post has been edited by catskills: 23 February 2007 - 01:43 PM
#33
Posted 27 February 2007 - 03:42 PM
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
#34
Posted 27 February 2007 - 04:03 PM
Liftblog.com
#35
Posted 27 February 2007 - 05:01 PM
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
#36
Posted 28 February 2007 - 05:35 AM
#37
Posted 28 February 2007 - 07:23 AM
liftmech, on Feb 28 2007, 05:35 AM, said:
Not once you are on the lift, but when you are standing in line it does.
#38
Posted 28 February 2007 - 09:11 AM
andyh1962, on Feb 23 2007, 07:07 AM, said:
Same concept probably holds for ski lifts, run them slower than full speed for a while so the various parts can get used to working with each other. saves a bit of maintenance in the long term.
Interesting theory...however these lifts are suppose to be tested at loads never to be seen again at their highest speed prior to public riding them. At 2-3 million for a new six pack I would want mine to jump out of the box on the first public day! No exceptions allowed.
#39
Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:23 PM
mikest2, on Feb 28 2007, 08:23 AM, said:
I suppose from that standpoint the speed difference would get more people up the hill, lowering wait times
#40
Posted 01 March 2007 - 05:08 PM
Your Northeastern US Representative
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











