Jump to content


Intrawest to be purchased by Fortress Investment Group, LLC


  • You cannot reply to this topic
13 replies to this topic

#1 ski9600

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 118 Posts:

Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:14 AM

Intrawest announced today that they support a $35/share buyout by Fortress Investment Group, LLC. This change will make Intrawest a private corporation (instead of publicly traded). More here: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/ar...8&Symbol=US:IDR

#2 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,038 Posts:

Posted 11 August 2006 - 08:24 AM

View Postski9600, on Aug 11 2006, 10:14 AM, said:

Intrawest announced today that they support a $35/share buyout by Fortress Investment Group, LLC. This change will make Intrawest a private corporation (instead of publicly traded). More here: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/ar...8&Symbol=US:IDR

Hopefully some of your 401K was invested in Interwest Stock!!
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#3 ski9600

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 118 Posts:

Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:07 AM

View PostLift Dinosaur, on Aug 11 2006, 10:24 AM, said:

Hopefully some of your 401K was invested in Interwest Stock!!

Yeah, I was thinking of moving some of it but never did....you snooze, you looze lol.

#4 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 11 August 2006 - 10:07 AM

It'll be interesting to see what, if anything, comes out of the deal. Will Fortress keep everything, or will they break up the company and sell it off piecemeal? Will some of their reported $28 billion capital stock be 'eagerly invested', as they claim?
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#5 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,029 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 12 August 2006 - 04:58 AM

The buy out and its ramifications were the subject of much discussion at work yesterday. Right now we have no idea what their intentions or strategic plan are so we will have to wait and see I guess. It will be interesting to see if the financial model is any different with a private company.
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#6 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 12 August 2006 - 09:48 AM

Without being beholden to shareholders, I would think that there would be a more aggressive investment model. At least we all hope that's the case.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#7 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,029 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 13 August 2006 - 05:38 AM

That's assuming Fortress want to be involved in the ski industry. :biggrin:
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#8 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 14 August 2006 - 04:30 AM

...which may be assuming a lot. I don't know much about the company. Yesterday's Denver Post had an article in the business section about the deal. One financial type they interviewed was of the opinion that Fortress would just break the company up and sell it piecemeal. Our management types are all hyped up about the deal, but as one of my co-workers said, it won't change how we do lift maintenance.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#9 LiftTech

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 281 Posts:

Posted 14 August 2006 - 08:18 AM

I, personally, wouldn’t be so quick to say that, I’ve been though four owner, no two were the same, the level of maintenance is determined by the amount of money “they” wish to use for it. Do you think it would change if the headlines read, “ASC sells Steam Boat and purchases Copper”? Stranger things have happened.

#10 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 16 August 2006 - 11:17 AM

Point taken. If ASC had the cash to buy us (and it doesn't sound as if they do anyway) we might just buy a lot of grease and skip the expensive stuff until it fails. Personal opinion based upon hearsay and rumours.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#11 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 16 August 2006 - 11:19 AM

Does anyone body think the Aspen Skiing Company would like to buy the boat if the Mueller's don't?
- Cameron

#12 mikest2

    Mountain Operations

  • Administrator I
  • 1,204 Posts:

Posted 22 October 2006 - 07:36 PM

This was at saminfo.com :

October 20, 2006


SAM Magazine—Vancouver, B.C., Oct. 20, 2006—Intrawest laid off 200 full-time employees, primarily managers, across its several divisions and resorts earlier this week as part of an effort to improve its bottom-line performance in the coming year. The move was made the day before Intrawest shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the company’s sale to Fortress Investment Group (see earlier story), clearing the way for a closing as early as next week.

The layoffs were concentrated in the summer golf resort of Sandestin (50 employees) and the real estate division, Intrawest’s Hugh Smythe told SAM. Smythe, the president and COO of the leisure and travel group, said here were 48 layoffs from among the staffs of the winter resorts, including 10 at Tremblant, several at Whistler-Blackcomb, and seven at Snowshoe, W.V.

Smythe also told SAM that the timing was coincidental and for the most part unrelated to the Fortress sale. The exceptions, he said, were six employees who had been working on Intrawest’s China initiative, which Fortress does not plan to pursue.

The layoffs grew out of the dozens of meetings Intrawest executives have had with potential investors over the past six months, Smythe explained. These meetings sharpened Intrawest’s awareness of its internal weaknesses and performance against industry benchmarks.

The layoffs are just part of several steps Intrawest has taken to cut costs and build a cushion against a slight softening of the resort real estate market and the usual weather uncertainties, Smythe said. Those steps included cuts to overhead, such as travel budgets, and elimination of some unfilled positions. “This is the sort of thing you have to do from time to time,” he added.

While he emphasized that the scale of the layoffs is small—Intrawest has between 5,000 and 6,000 employees—Smythe said that any layoffs are painful for all those involved. Those sentiments were echoed by Snowshoe spokeswoman Andrea Smith, who told the Charlotte Daily Mail, "These were very valued employees that did a great job for the company. I know everyone is very sad to see them go."

Added Snowshoe GM Bill Rock, "Everyone that was impacted was given the opportunity to apply for other jobs at Snowshoe. We expect that more than half will rejoin the company in a different capacity."
...Mike

#13 Aussierob

    Lift Sparky

  • Industry II
  • 1,029 Posts:
  • Interests:Search and Rescue
    Hockey
    Ski Touring
    Geocaching

Posted 22 October 2006 - 08:09 PM

We heard about the 48 lay offs at work, but the info I have is that all the lay offs were in the head office in Vancouver and about 20 of those were vacant positions that won't be filled.
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.

#14 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:14 AM

All we were told is that there were 'several core positions' that 'were eliminated'. I'm always amazed how we hear more from sources outside the company.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users