Jump to content


Leitner-Poma terminal installation


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 05 July 2006 - 09:17 PM

Leitner-Poma terminals seem to be very prefabricated in large sections, unlike the DoppelmayrCTEC lifts. Here are the major parts.

First the masts are installed into the foundations with cross beams.

Attached File  masts.jpg (55.05K)
Number of downloads: 22

Attached File  masts_installed.jpg (67.78K)
Number of downloads: 24

Then come the side tire banks, which are in one huge section for each side.

Attached File  side_frame.jpg (2.35MB)
Number of downloads: 26

Attached File  side_frame_2.jpg (51.53K)
Number of downloads: 15

Attached File  side_installation.jpg (68.46K)
Number of downloads: 36

Attached File  side_installed.jpg (477.49K)
Number of downloads: 30

After that the turnaround is added on the end.

Attached File  turnaround.jpg (311.55K)
Number of downloads: 25

Then the drive and bullwheel are installed, and the roof and windows are installed.

bullwheel
Attached File  Bullwheel_full.jpg (295.94K)
Number of downloads: 27

roof frame
Attached File  roof.jpg (328.29K)
Number of downloads: 13

Attached File  frame_without_roof.jpg (79.19K)
Number of downloads: 24

almost done
Attached File  almost_done.JPG (28.9K)
Number of downloads: 47

Finished!

Attached File  done.jpg (55.73K)
Number of downloads: 30

This system seems better and easier than having a lot of smaller parts. All of the DoppelmayrCTEC terminal skins are installed piece by piece on site.

This post has been edited by Skier: 05 July 2006 - 09:19 PM

- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#2 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 05 July 2006 - 09:53 PM

Well, Garaventa CTEC's Stealth 2 and 3 terminals were built similar to Leitner-Poma's. The new UNI-G and UNI-GS appear to be a hassel to put together, but they are also a lot more complex too. The terminals have the ability to park the carriers in the terminals, run backwards, etc.
- Cameron

#3 ceo

    Established User

  • Member
  • 59 Posts:

Posted 07 July 2006 - 11:56 AM

I saw the base terminal of the new Garaventa-CTEC Peabody Express quad in Cannon's parking lot before they put it up; it was in similar sections and indeed still shrink-wrapped. I'm sure all the manufacturers would prefer to do as much assembly as possible in the factory; QA is easier that way.

#4 vons

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 940 Posts:

Posted 07 July 2006 - 12:56 PM

Doppelmayr Ctec terminals are not hard to assemble. The unie Gs-s terminals arrive on site as four preassembled conveyor pieces, six sections if the -M length. These four sections include two strait sections that have grip actuator rails and pto & deflection sheaves attached and two straight into contour sections think J shaped. These four sections bolt onto the runway beams and structural cross members. Other than the carriage most of the lift can be assembled with a boom truck. The Poma design is nice though, I think it takes them about a day to assemble in the field a D-Ctec uni-g takes about a week if everything is on site.

Note I wrote uni-gs-s if you look in recent lift construction photo thread you will see a uni-gs-m note how the sections bolt together this is how D-ctec offers different length terminals in the same model

#5 skiersage

    SAM student

  • Administrator I
  • 858 Posts:

Posted 07 July 2006 - 01:38 PM

View Postceo, on Jul 7 2006, 03:56 PM, said:

I'm sure all the manufacturers would prefer to do as much assembly as possible in the factory; QA is easier that way.


Parking lot fabricator Lift Engineering might beg to differ...
-Sage


If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And then find someone whose life is giving them vodka and have a party.
-Ron White





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users