Jump to content


Canyons ski lease in turmoil


  • You cannot reply to this topic
17 replies to this topic

#1 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 27 June 2006 - 09:58 AM

Crazy!

http://www.sltrib.co...ness/ci_3984185

Canyons ski lease in turmoil
By Christopher Smart
The Salt Lake Tribune

American Skiing Corp. has sunk $60 million into improvements on terrain encompassing its western Summit County resort, The Canyons. But now, its landlord, Wolf Mountain, claims American Skiing has defaulted on its lease. (Chrisopher Smart/The Salt Lake Tribune)

PARK CITY - A contract dispute over land leases could jeopardize American Skiing Corp's. ownership of The Canyons ski resort - and the $60 million in improvements made during the past eight years.
Canyons Vice President Tim Vetter conceded as much Monday, though he doubts such a doomsday scenario will occur. Still, Vetter is asking a court to intervene - a hearing is scheduled for Wednesday in Park City's 3rd District Court - and a protracted legal fight could compromise preparations for the upcoming ski season.
The dispute involves 550 acres owned by the D.A. Osguthorpe family and leased to Wolf Mountain, which it then subleased to American Skiing. Although the land is a fraction of the 3,500 acres of The Canyon's ski terrain, it's key to operating the resort, according to documents filed in Park City's 3rd District Court.
Wolf Mountain claims American Skiing defaulted on its lease by amending legal agreements with the Osguthorpes without Wolf Mountain operative Kenny Griswold's knowledge, essentially reducing Wolf Mountain's interest "to nothing more than an easement."
The agreement between American Skiing and the Osguthorpes "endangered all of Wolf Mountain's rights under the Osguthorpe lease," according to court pleadings. "It is imperative that Wolf Mountain regain control of the resort immediately so that it may begin preparations for the 2006-2007 ski season."
American Skiing, which owns and operates seven other ski resorts around the country, has asked the court to stop the lease from being terminated. American Skiing officials argue that any technical defaults have been cured and Wolf Mountain's claims would cause "irreparable
harm" to the Maine-based operator.
Wolf Mountain's allegations "are reasonably likely to constitute a default under American Skiing Corp.'s financing agreements," according to pleadings filed in Park City's 3rd District Court, "and otherwise negatively impact American Ski Corp.'s business, goodwill and revenues."
In the early 1990s, Griswold cobbled together agreements from various parties to form the Wolf Mountain ski area from the now-defunct ParkWest. In 1997, he subleased the land to American Skiing.
Over the past eight years, American Skiing has poured millions into new ski lifts, snow making, lodges and trail grooming. It had planned another $10 million in improvements for this summer, Vetter said.
The Canyons attracted national attention during the 2002 Winter Olympics when Katie Couric hosted the "Today" show from the resort.
"We are very disappointed with the position that Wolf Mountain has taken in order to resolve this issue," Vetter said Monday. "We are confident that we are in full compliance [with the lease] and will move forward."
Griswold could not be reached for comment Monday.
csmart@sltrib.com


Does this mean the two new lift projects this summer are off?

This post has been edited by Skier: 27 June 2006 - 09:59 AM

- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#2 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 27 June 2006 - 10:32 AM

Could be, but what area is it that is disputed? If it is the new expansion area I'd say it is off, but otherwise it seems like they should still be able to build the new stuff.

I had no idea Wolf Mountain still owned the land and leased it to ASC.

Seems like the Canyons and ASC can never get out of trouble.
Zack

#3 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 27 June 2006 - 10:35 AM

I guess the part of the resort that's leased from Wolf Mountain is the Super Condor and Golden Eagle area, but that includes the gondola, and without that they don't have a resort. Let's hope they get it sorted out and that the lift projects are still on
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#4 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 27 June 2006 - 10:41 AM

Yeah thats what I took from it too. If they lose the area in question, the whole thing is pointless.

Quote

a protracted legal fight could compromise preparations for the upcoming ski season.
This makes it sound like all stuff this summer could be off. We'll see I guess.
- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#5 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 27 June 2006 - 10:55 AM

The lift projects aren't in the area leased from Wolf Mountain, but Wolf Mountain controls the gondola and Golden Eagle, the only two ways up from the base. If they actually close that part of the resort down, the only hope would be to build a road to the bottom of Tombstone (which isn't really that far from the base area) but that wouldn't work if they can't finish the Tombstone replacement
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#6 boardski

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 760 Posts:

Posted 28 June 2006 - 03:43 PM

Could this issue effect Steamboat also??? How far along is the Tombstone and Sunshine removals? Steamboat could get by without the Sunshine lift for a season but the Canyons could NOT get by without the Tombstone lift for any amount of time. Hopefully thngs will get ironed out quickly.
Skiing since 1977, snowboarding since 1989

#7 truckintr

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 59 Posts:

Posted 30 June 2006 - 06:07 AM

Come on this shouldn't be so surprising. American Skiing Corp has been in money troubles for a very very long time. They keep buying, building replacing, improving,(they are spending $10. MILLON this summer alone on thier Utah property), but can't attract that many skiers. \
I'd bet that PCMR is watching this real close. I'm sure they would like to step in take over Park West( i still refuse to call it the Canyons, cause the real canyons are The Cottonwoods.)

This post has been edited by truckintr: 30 June 2006 - 06:08 AM


#8 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 30 June 2006 - 10:01 AM

Someone mentioned it a while back that there was a timeshare company that had a lodge at the base of The Canyons and was looking at purchasing the resort if something ever happened.

I kind of doubt that Powdr. Corp would purchase The Canyons but who knows.
- Cameron

#9 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 30 June 2006 - 10:04 AM

I think PCMR and The Canyons combined would be bigger than Vail, right? And speaking of Vail, weren't they interested in The Canyons a while back when ASC first took it over?
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#10 Powdr

    Established User

  • Member
  • 204 Posts:

Posted 30 June 2006 - 11:24 AM

PCMR (3,300) + The Canyons (3,500) = 6,700. Bigger than Vail. PCMR (750K) + The Canyons (450K) = 1.2 million skiers. Just about any resort owner woudl be happy w/ those numbers.

Isn't going to happen though, as PCMR seems to be in a holding pattern (not in aqusistion mode) and if anything, would sell themselves for a good offer.

Powdr

#11 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,038 Posts:

Posted 30 June 2006 - 07:23 PM

View PostPowdr, on Jun 30 2006, 01:24 PM, said:

PCMR (3,300) + The Canyons (3,500) = 6,700. Bigger than Vail. PCMR (750K) + The Canyons (450K) = 1.2 million skiers. Just about any resort owner woudl be happy w/ those numbers.

Isn't going to happen though, as PCMR seems to be in a holding pattern (not in aqusistion mode) and if anything, would sell themselves for a good offer.

Powdr

If you are going to equate PCMR and Canyons, then you need to equate Vail AND Beaver Creek. Then the V.R. numbers are 6915 Acres, 2,491,000 skiers days.
I agree anyone would be happy with 1.2M skiers days in Utah, but at what debt load?
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#12 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 01 July 2006 - 03:01 AM

I didn't know PCMR had that many more skiers than The Canyons, but The Canyons always seems pretty empty even in the Christmas season, especially outside the Tombstone/Saddleback area
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#13 Powdr

    Established User

  • Member
  • 204 Posts:

Posted 03 July 2006 - 06:53 AM

View PostLift Dinosaur, on Jun 30 2006, 07:23 PM, said:

If you are going to equate PCMR and Canyons, then you need to equate Vail AND Beaver Creek. Then the V.R. numbers are 6915 Acres, 2,491,000 skiers days.
I agree anyone would be happy with 1.2M skiers days in Utah, but at what debt load?



The difference is that you could ski the whole area without getting in a car. The debt load would be the deal killer. PCMR is run very lean, almost on a cash only basis and amassing that kind of dept would be very uncomfortable for them. They would have to try to offset that debt with more real estate development, something they are fairly averse to.

Powdr

#14 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 04 July 2006 - 04:00 PM

I think there's a better chance of DV and PCMR hooking up for a skier-only interconnect pass like Snowbird and Alta
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#15 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 04 July 2006 - 05:46 PM

Update:

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_4003133

Canyons suit strikes lessee as power grab
Griswold knew of disputed changes in '04 but didn't file
By Christopher Smart
The Salt Lake Tribune


PARK CITY - Why now?
That's what American Skiing Corp. officials are asking as Wolf Mountain Resort presses to take back The Canyons ski area - nearly a decade after signing it away.
American Skiing doesn't want to give it up. The Canyons, high on the slopes of the Wasatch Back, has been one of the bright spots during difficult times for the Maine-based corporation that owns and operates seven other ski resorts.
According to court filings, American Skiing lost $60 million last year.
Kenny Griswold, Wolf Mountain's managing partner, alleges that American Skiing violated its lease agreement by cutting a back-door deal with the owner of 550 acres in the "heart" of the ski area. American Skiing's amended agreement with the Osguthorpe family has financially harmed him, Griswold asserts, and put The Canyons in default of its lease with Wolf Mountain. American Skiing maintains it is not in default.
The resort gained notoriety as home base for "The Today Show" during NBC's broadcasts of the 2002 Winter Games. Since then, the resort has enjoyed a post-Olympic boom in ski visitors - along with its neighbors, Deer Valley and Park City Mountain Resort.
This week, in Utah's 3rd District Court in Park City, attorneys for American

Skiing noted that Griswold had known about the Osguthorpe agreement for years but had not objected as The Canyons proceeded with its multimillion-dollar expansion. They are seeking a preliminary injunction to halt eviction proceedings. Judge Bruce Lubeck took the case under advisement and said he would rule within several weeks.
Since inking a lease deal with Wolf Mountain in 1997, The Canyons and its parent company have injected $60 million in new ski lifts and lodges across 3,500 acres just north of Park City. The once mom-and-pop ski area, originally known as ParkWest, has been transformed into a world-class destination.
In addition, American Skiing brass say they've set the stage for millions in real estate development in the booming post-Olympic Park City housing market. They say the corporation is in its strongest position in years, thanks, in part, to successes at The Canyons.
The timing of the default notice is suspect, CEO William J. Fair said.
"Griswold said he had known about the default for two years," Fair testified. "But Mr. [Michael] Baker did not want him to move forward with it."
Baker, a Park City-based financial attorney, partnered with Griswold in the early 1990s to launch the Wolf Mountain ski resort from the ashes of the ParkWest operation

that dated from the late 1960s. Griswold, who lives in Southern California but maintains a Park City home, bought out Baker this spring - about the time Wolf Mountain filed for default.
In the end, ParkWest failed because its ski terrain and base lodges were spread across acreage owned by a number of feuding landowners. Griswold succeeded in leasing more than a dozen parcels from various interests, enabling Wolf Mountain in 1992 to open to skiers and snowboarders.
But in an interview after Wednesday's testimony, Griswold said Wolf Mountain could not attract investors such as Les Otten, former American Skiing CEO, without the 550 acres owned by the Osguthorpes. That land was key for a major expansion.
In 1996, according to court documents, Griswold obtained a 28-year lease on the Osguthorpe land. The following year, he subleased about 3,000 of the accumulated acres to American Skiing.
Otten and American Skiing officials sought to change the lease deal with the Osguthorpes in 1997, 1998 and 2001, according to court documents. The Canyons raised the Osguthorpe's annual $150,000 lease payment to $200,000 a year for personal services. In exchange, the lease was amended to an "easement" across the land. Although no rationale for changing

the deal was brought up in Wednesday's hearing, in earlier court documents American Skiing officials have said they needed the Osguthorpes' cooperation to make certain improvements to the resort.
The act of transforming Wolf Mountain's agreement to an easement "cuts the heart" out of Griswold's holdings by rendering his sublease to American skiing meaningless, said one of his attorneys, Jesse Trentadue.
The land in question surrounds base functions at Red Pine Lodge and is critical for the operation of a gondola and chairlifts.
According to Wolf Mountain's lease to American Skiing, The Canyons' operatives could negotiate with the Osguthorpes, but any new deal would have to be approved by Griswold. When Otten renegotiated the Osguthorpe deal, he falsely represented himself as Wolf Mountain, according to court documents.
In courtroom testimony, Griswold said he had worked during the past two years in good faith with representative of The Canyons to resolve the issue. But, he said, they have refused to "cure" the default.
The lease-violation claim was a last resort, he said.
"If I had filed a claim two years ago, they'd accuse me of not working with them," he said.
Wolf Mountain must pay "fair market value" for improvements made by The Canyons in the event he reclaims the ski resort, Griswold added.
The 1997 agreement with American Skiing provided Wolf Mountain with $11 million in cash and took over $30 million in debt. It outlined annual rent based on 4 percent of gross revenues and would pay Wolf Mountain the equivalent of 11 percent of The Canyons real-estate development.
In court, Wolf Mountain attorneys attacked American Skiing's financial viability, wondering aloud whether the parent company is bleeding The Canyons dry.
American Skiing has accumulated losses nationally of $640 million, Wolf Mountain attorneys stated in court filings. When the company went public in 1997, its shares sold for $18. Now they trade for 17 cents. American Skiing also operates ski resorts in Sunday River and Sugarloaf, Maine; Attitash, N.H.; Steamboat, Colo.; and Killington, Pico and Mount Snow, Vt.
Griswold said The Canyons has developed only one-seventh of its real-estate potential because the parent company lacks financial wherewithal. That makes his 11 percent share of development far short of what it should be during Park City's present building boom.
"We have a real problem. There has been little development in the last several years," Griswold said. "This is my life's work. It's important to me to have a legacy."
csmart@sltrib.com

Key dates


ParkWest, which opened in the 1960s, becomes Wolf Mountain in 1992.

In 1996, Wolf Mountain leases 550 acres from the Osguthorpe family.

In 1997, The Canyons leases 3,000 acres from Wolf Mountain.

The Canyons amends the Osguthorpe agreement in 1997, 1998 and 2001.

Wolf Mountain becomes aware of the changes by at least 2004.

Wolf Mountain files a notice of default March 31, 2006.

This post has been edited by Skier: 04 July 2006 - 05:47 PM

- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com

#16 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 04 July 2006 - 06:42 PM

Sounds like this is gonna be a he-said-she-said pissing contest between Wolf Mountain and ASC. Just hope it doesn't affect the ski season at all
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#17 spunkyskier01

    industry trainee

  • Industry II
  • 379 Posts:

Posted 05 July 2006 - 06:19 PM

personaly, i hope asc goes out of buisness, and some one ends up buying killington and mount snow, and then maybe, just maybe they will actualy paint the lifts and make the resort look nice again, thats just my 2 cents

This post has been edited by spunkyskier01: 05 July 2006 - 06:22 PM

Everything is just loop-de-loops and flibertyjibbit

#18 Peter

    Established User

  • Member
  • 4,314 Posts:

Posted 06 July 2006 - 05:02 PM

Ruling on The Canyons favors American Skiing
By Christopher Smart
The Salt Lake Tribune


PARK CITY - American Skiing Co. will keep The Canyons resort - at least for now - but Wolf Mountain representatives vow to continue pressing their legal case to reclaim it.
Third District Judge Bruce Lubeck has signed a preliminary injunction stopping Wolf Mountain from progressing with default proceedings against The Canyons.
Kenny Griswold, Wolf Mountain's managing partner, has asserted that American Skiing violated the terms of its 50-year lease.
In his ruling, released this week, Lubeck did not consider the merits of Wolf Mountain's allegation. "This ruling does not speak to the ultimate issue of whether there has been a default and whether it has been cured," he wrote in a memorandum decision. But the judge decided to grant the injunction because he feared, without it, the ski resort would not be able to open this winter.
"Clearly if the notice of termination were allowed, and Wolf Mountain then acted in dispatch . . . it appears to the court that a ski resort could not begin to operate for this ski season on this short notice."
American Skiing officials are breathing easier.
"We're obviously pleased," said Tim Vetter, The Canyons vice president, on Wednesday. "This gives us the protection we've been seeking."
Lawyers for American Skiing will prepare their case against Wolf Mountain, Vetter said, which will demonstrate no default occurred on the multifaceted lease. No hearings have been set on that matter, and it could be year's end before such proceedings begin.
Nonetheless, American Skiing is confident it will continue to operate The Canyons.
"We haven't slowed down on our preparations for the upcoming ski season," Vetter said.
About $10 million in improvements will be added to the ski resort before Thanksgiving, including its planned Dreamcatcher Ski Lift, which will extend terrain to the south. The Canyons also plans to replace The Tombstone lift with a detachable six-pack chair and expand the Red Pine Lodge, Vetter said. Those upgrades will bring to $70 million the amount American Skiing has pumped into the ski area since leasing it from Wolf Mountain in 1997.
The Canyons has come a long way, Griswold conceded Wednesday, but it has a long way to go. He argues that American Skiing is too encumbered with debt to make the resort a top 10 venture.
"At the time [we signed the lease], we thought American Skiing Company was best. But we didn't expect American Skiing Company to be overwrought with debt."
Wolf Mountain will continue to press its default proceedings against The Canyons, Griswold said.
"The issue is still the issue. That's what we're waiting to get to."
According to Griswold, American Skiing officials cut a backdoor deal on 550 acres that the Osguthorpe family had leased to Griswold. It was the "key" parcel among 3,000 acres that Griswold subleased to The Canyons.
According to court documents, former American Skiing CEO Les Otten changed the agreement with the Osguthorpes in 1997, 1998 and 2001. Griswold alleges those amendments changed the sublease into an "easement" that undercut his original agreement with both the Osguthorpes and American Skiing.
He contends American Skiing is in default unless the company and the Osguthorpes revert to the initial deal.
"But they're having trouble," Griswold said, "because the Osguthorpes have refused to sign."
Two good options are available to settle the matter, Griswold said.
"We buy them out, or they buy us out."



I don't think that Wolf Mountain will be able to buy out ASC, so I predict The Canyons will buy out Wolf Mountain, if they have any money left.



What? Paint lifts? They look great!

Attached File(s)


- Peter<br />
Liftblog.com





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users