Possible Lift Designs / Features
#1
Posted 06 April 2006 - 06:33 PM
IE if someone falls and the operator can stop the chairs in the terminal but allow the line to keep moving @ a slower speed until the chairs stack up in the terminal. Is that even possible?
If i need to make this clearer let me know.
#2
Posted 06 April 2006 - 06:46 PM
#3
Posted 06 April 2006 - 07:01 PM
Liftblog.com
#5
Posted 06 April 2006 - 08:00 PM
I should also mention that this could mess up the lifts designed load capacity since one side could have more carriers than on the other side. For example, what if 3/4 of the carriers were on the uphill side while only 1/4 were on the downhill side. See the problems the lift could run into? Some fix grips lifts actually will shut down and will run extremely slow if they become overweighted. Not sure about detachables since they have bigger motors but I think it could still mess things up a bit. Especially while loading the lift. People would have less time to get to the loading zone which would then cause more lift down time. Sorry Jeff, but I don't think it's that great of an idea.
#7
Posted 07 April 2006 - 07:23 AM
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#8
Posted 08 April 2006 - 03:17 PM
Aussierob, on Apr 7 2006, 09:23 AM, said:
There is a 480VAC diesel generator in the return terminal just for the reason you mentioned...
Poma experimented with using AC motors at the return but switched to DC because they needed more startup torque.
#9
Posted 09 April 2006 - 08:38 AM
SkiBachelor, on Apr 6 2006, 10:00 PM, said:
I agree with your first statement but not with your second. I've run lifts with no carriers at all on one side (after a rope replacement while putting chairs on) and there has been no problem. Lift drives automatically adjust for differential loads, i.e. a full load uphill and empty carriers downhill. But I'll agree that having wierd spacing would be problematic for lightly-loaded towers, perhaps to the point of a derail.
#12
Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:35 PM
#14
Posted 10 April 2006 - 06:03 PM
Mike, on Apr 9 2006, 07:43 PM, said:
Yes it does. One would think it would be impossible to 'overload' a lift without triggering an overcurrent fault and shutting it down; if that happened one would want to fix the problem.
#15
Posted 16 June 2006 - 04:22 AM
SkiBachelor, on Apr 9 2006, 04:43 PM, said:
We had a problem with the old Yan drive that we couldn't resolve. We wound up running it as a double. The lift got an all new drive and controls in 2005. (same as Cystal got in 2004). We are doing Magic this year and olympic next year.
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











