Jump to content


Does anyone have pics of the Sky Cab at Snowmass?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
18 replies to this topic

#1 SidBurn

    Established User

  • Member
  • 64 Posts:

Posted 16 February 2006 - 10:31 AM

If so, post them here

#2 spunkyskier01

    industry trainee

  • Industry II
  • 379 Posts:

Posted 16 February 2006 - 12:23 PM

http://www.colorados...s/snowmass.html
Everything is just loop-de-loops and flibertyjibbit

#3 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:07 PM

Yep

Yes Cameron you can use the pictures on the site.

Attached File(s)


This post has been edited by Kicking Horse: 16 February 2006 - 07:14 PM

Jeff

#4 Allan

    Maintenance Manager

  • Administrator I
  • 2,733 Posts:

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:15 PM

I have a question! Why does it have detachable grips?
- Allan

#5 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:16 PM

That's an interesting lift, if i am seeing it correctly, it has highspeed grips? and it has 3 sets of cabins? It's fixed grip, so why the high speed grips, and secondly, how does the timing work if there are three sets of cabins?

#6 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:46 PM

I believe LiftDinosaur mentioned in the past that the reason why it has detachable grips is because it was going to take too long to get the Leitner Pulse grips for the lift before it was supposed to open. The bullwheels had a special groove cut for the detachable grips to allow them go around the bullhweel. I guess it's fair to say that this is the only lift in the world that has detachable grips on a non detachable lift.
- Cameron

#7 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:56 PM

I think there are 4 sets of cains with 3 per set. Basicly when one set is in the terminal the whole line slows down. I will shot video of this when i go out there in March. It's pretty damn cool.
Jeff

#8 coskibum

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 596 Posts:
  • Interests:Skiing, Running, Mountain Biking, Baseball, Hiking, ski history, and Chairlifts.

Posted 17 February 2006 - 10:32 AM

read lift dino's remarks on that here:

http://www.colorados...topic.php?t=270

#9 skier2

    Established User

  • Member
  • 496 Posts:

Posted 17 February 2006 - 10:49 AM

Is the lift really short? I would have thnought that Snowmass would have put in a cabriolet, not a pulse gondola.

#10 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,038 Posts:

Posted 17 February 2006 - 04:09 PM

View Postskier2, on Feb 17 2006, 11:49 AM, said:

Is the lift really short? I would have thnought that Snowmass would have put in a cabriolet, not a pulse gondola.

1. Yes, the lift is very short -@1100'. It's intent is to connect the soon to be developed base area to the Snowmass Mall, which is at the top terminal.
2. Your are discussing apples- "a cabriolet" and oranges- "a pulse gondola". A cabriolet is a cabin design- open on the upper section and of the standup variety; a gondola is also a cabin design- enclosed and generally a sitdown, but some also have a combination of standing and sitting; and a "pulse" uses fixed carrier locations which slow for the terminals and then speed up (to 1000 fpm) once leaving the stations.
3. Originally, the lift was to be a pulse cabriolet (cabins generally made by Gangloff), but the price on the Sigma gondola cabins wasn't that far off, so Snowmass opted for the enclosed cabins.
4. When you mentioned "cabriolet", were you thinking like the one at the Canyons? That is a detachable and the terminal size was prohibitive for the area Snowmass had to work with.
Hope this helps!
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#11 Zage

    Established User

  • Member
  • 358 Posts:

Posted 18 February 2006 - 02:00 PM

View PostSkiBachelor, on Feb 16 2006, 08:46 PM, said:

I guess it's fair to say that this is the only lift in the world that has detachable grips on a non detachable lift.


Not really, there is a jig-back funitel in France and it has detachable grips and it is a non-detachable lift. Plus there are some more fixed pulse gondola's with detachable grips in the world. So really, there are other non-detachable lifts with detachable grips.
Tyler.M

#12 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 18 February 2006 - 02:07 PM

Oh yea, I forgot about that weird one in France that's like a funitel but not.
- Cameron

#13 Yaoma

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 156 Posts:
  • Interests:down hill / freeride mtn bike
    mines PBR old cars
    WWII

Posted 19 February 2006 - 06:21 PM

rode on a poma pulse (cave tour) on the G.J. tour by the Hotel Colorado????
B





K2-29 clear

#14 skiersage

    SAM student

  • Administrator I
  • 858 Posts:

Posted 19 February 2006 - 07:54 PM

http://www.skilifts.org/nwsforum/index.php...pe=post&id=4161
Is it just me or do the Pininfarina Diamond cabins look like the Leitner POMA Diamond cabins?
http://www.skilifts.org/nwsforum/index.php...pe=post&id=4537
-Sage


If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And then find someone whose life is giving them vodka and have a party.
-Ron White

#15 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 19 February 2006 - 08:33 PM

That's because they are the same cabins. Leitner Poma owns Pininfarina just like Doppelmayr/Garaventa own CWA. I'm pretty sure L-P owns Pininfarina.
- Cameron

#16 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,038 Posts:

Posted 20 February 2006 - 07:08 AM

Leitner does not own Pininfarina - they are an Italian design firm. They do own SIGMA, and Pininfarina was the designer of the Diamond cabin for SIGMA. :thumbsup:
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#17 ski9600

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 118 Posts:

Posted 20 February 2006 - 07:12 AM

View PostSkiBachelor, on Feb 19 2006, 09:33 PM, said:

That's because they are the same cabins. Leitner Poma owns Pininfarina just like Doppelmayr/Garaventa own CWA. I'm pretty sure L-P owns Pininfarina.

I appears to me that Pininfarina is separate from L-P. They have a long history in automotive design and manufacturing, many times designing prototypes for the likes of Ferrari, Alfa Romeo, and even Corvette. I think probably L-P contracted with them to design and manufacture the cabins. More here: http://www.pininfari...index.php?sot=2

#18 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,906 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 21 February 2006 - 12:45 PM

View PostYaoma, on Feb 19 2006, 07:21 PM, said:

rode on a poma pulse (cave tour) on the G.J. tour by the Hotel Colorado????


You must be talking about the Iron Mountain Tramway, with the orange cabins.

(side note: the GJ tour you're talking about- was that at the roundtable last March?)
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#19 tcs

    Established User

  • Member
  • 67 Posts:
  • Interests:Lost ski areas

Posted 22 February 2006 - 12:59 PM

View PostYaoma, on Feb 19 2006, 07:21 PM, said:

rode on a poma pulse (cave tour) on the G.J. tour by the Hotel Colorado????

I'm confused. G.J. would be Grand Junction. Might you have ridden the gondola in Glenwood Springs?
The Colorado Skier





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users