Gondola stations
#2
Posted 08 February 2006 - 02:21 PM
#3
Posted 08 February 2006 - 02:53 PM
#4
Posted 08 February 2006 - 04:44 PM
#5
Posted 08 February 2006 - 05:27 PM
#6
Posted 08 February 2006 - 05:51 PM
SidBurn, on Feb 8 2006, 04:44 PM, said:
Yes but it depends on the resorts choice.
#7
Posted 08 February 2006 - 06:34 PM
But why is that? It doesn't seem like chairs are inherently any more weatherproof than gondola cabins. ???
TCS
#9
Posted 08 February 2006 - 07:04 PM
#10
Posted 08 February 2006 - 08:01 PM
Quote
if you look at the terminal itself it is no larger than that of the born free, it was just enclosed by a normal structure.
#11
Posted 08 February 2006 - 08:55 PM
coskibum, on Feb 8 2006, 01:21 PM, said:
Although Vail gondola is a second generation for the same line it is not in the same building as the original gondola. Another important concideration when deciding to enclose the gondola terminal in a building I woudl also think would be if it were being buit for foot passengers as well. I also have not seen Keystone or Vail park their entire line at night even though they are both able to do so. The chair parking issue seems to be more dictated by climate and weather patterns. I am not aware of any resort in Colorado that routinely parks their entire gondola line.
Theres a place for all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.
"You could say that a mountain is alot like a woman, once you think you know every inch of her and you're about to dip your skis into some soft, deep powder...Bam, you've got two broken legs, cracked ribs and you pay your $20 just to let her punch your lift ticket all over again"
#12
Posted 09 February 2006 - 10:02 AM
poloxskier, on Feb 8 2006, 09:55 PM, said:
I think Aspen does and to a lesser extent, Steamboat. That's because most gondi's in CO are used to transport diners to on-mountain restaurants at night
#13
Posted 09 February 2006 - 05:12 PM
#14
Posted 10 February 2006 - 03:06 PM
tcs, on Feb 8 2006, 07:34 PM, said:
But why is that? It doesn't seem like chairs are inherently any more weatherproof than gondola cabins. ???
TCS
Gondola cabins are maintenance-intensive while carriers take very little to service. I can perform most maintenance on my carriers ('86 Poma quads) with them still on line. Gondola cabins have seats, windows, fibreglass, doors mechanisms, and the like. It's much better to repair them indoors. As for off-line storage, carriers of any sort need a building if the area is prone to heavy snow in addition to the weather conditions that necessitate nightly removal. Grips don't travel well through terminals if they are encased in snow or ice.
#16
Posted 10 February 2006 - 04:36 PM
#17
Posted 10 February 2006 - 06:05 PM
Quote
true for the base, but the summit is the same bldg.
keystone and steamboat use the same also for top/btm
#18
Posted 10 February 2006 - 07:52 PM
coskibum, on Feb 10 2006, 05:05 PM, said:
keystone and steamboat use the same also for top/btm
It is the same total building for the summit but the new gondola uses another building that was built on as an ad-on wing to accomidate the gondola and associated equipment. The original building is now the resturant up top.
Theres a place for all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.
"You could say that a mountain is alot like a woman, once you think you know every inch of her and you're about to dip your skis into some soft, deep powder...Bam, you've got two broken legs, cracked ribs and you pay your $20 just to let her punch your lift ticket all over again"
#19
Posted 13 February 2006 - 09:54 AM
Quote
The upper lifts on Mt Hood, and I assume summit chair at Bachelor have 'night drives' which allows them to run the chairless line on a lower HP motor to keep sheaves from icing up.
This blog has some interesting info on operating lifts in inclement weather areas: http://www.skihood.com/cs/blogs/daveriley/.../01/22/382.aspx
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











