Longest High Speed Quad in the World
#21
Posted 01 June 2005 - 06:50 AM
-Iain
#22
Posted 01 June 2005 - 08:06 AM
Duck, on Jun 1 2005, 10:50 AM, said:
-Iain
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I've wondered that myself Iain. That's a LOT of weight on there, plus it goes up and down 2 major ridges.
dave
#23
Posted 01 June 2005 - 12:46 PM
http://skilifts.org/id-silvermt.htm
#24
Posted 01 June 2005 - 01:00 PM
Jonni, on May 30 2005, 05:39 PM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The Slide Brook Express exists because Sugarbush bought the former Glen Ellen ski area and turned it into Sugarbush North. They tried for a long time to get the permits to develop the Slide Brook watershed between them (which is Forest Service land, I'm pretty sure), and were denied due to environmental concerns. Before SBE went in, the areas were connected by a shuttle bus.
#25
Posted 01 June 2005 - 02:01 PM
As far as the Silver Mountain Gondola, here's the facts about the lift: http://www.silvermt.com/gondola.html. The counter weight is an older style block and cable weight. The counter weight alone weighs 55 tons!
Your Northeastern US Representative
#26
Posted 01 June 2005 - 03:36 PM
SkiBachelor, on Jun 1 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
http://skilifts.org/id-silvermt.htm
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Man, that is one ugly system. :---:
-Iain
#27
Posted 02 June 2005 - 04:12 AM
Duck, on Jun 1 2005, 07:50 AM, said:
-Iain
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As long as the engineer sizes the rope correctly, there isn't much diference from a shorter length. The tension station does have to accomodate more travel; the Flyer has around 14 feet of room for the carriage, allowing it to take up 28 feet of rope (out of 19,800' total). May not sound like much but big ropes on detachables don't actually stretch that much. They have solid cores which keep the diameter stable. Older ropes with hemp cores are more susceptible to stretch over time, owing to the strands squishing the core as they are pulled tight. Slide Brook may have tensioning in both ends, does anyone know?
#30
Posted 02 June 2005 - 08:26 AM
Your Northeastern US Representative
#31
Posted 02 June 2005 - 10:44 AM
Duck, on Jun 2 2005, 09:20 AM, said:
I'll hike up to either end sometime soon ( I hope) and take some pictures. I live about a minute down the road :)
dave
#32
Posted 02 June 2005 - 09:02 PM
#33
Posted 03 June 2005 - 03:53 AM
Quote
I guess I meant like, from a mechanical standpoint. :) If each tension system is putting on constant force throughout the travel of the bullwheel in its tracks, what keeps the system balanced? Why wouldn't it just bottom out on one end?
Quote
Could be cost? If they wanted to keep the system costs down as low as possible, maybe.
-Iain
#34
Posted 03 June 2005 - 04:05 AM
KZ, on Jun 3 2005, 01:02 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have wondered this myself. It really should be, as it is shut down on really cold days due to over exposure. The ski patrol has a map hanging up in their patrol room that shows all the work roads that lead up to the Slide Brook Lift line that a few cats could go up to help with the evac. There is also first aid/evac equipment in waterproof bags on every other tower should patrol need it once they get up there. The only problem is that the work roads are long and would require quite some time to navigate up in a cat. They frequently run a cat or two up into the slide brook area though just so that the roads are packed down in case of emergency.
dave
#35
Posted 03 June 2005 - 04:07 AM
Your Northeastern US Representative
#36
Posted 04 June 2005 - 06:57 AM
Duck, on Jun 3 2005, 04:53 AM, said:
-Iain
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dual tensioning doesn't work on balance. One end is a traditional 'active' system; the other is a passive system. When the lift is built, the passive terminal or carriage is placed almost as far forward as it will go. The rope is then spliced as usual and the active end does all the work. When the active end is about to run out of travel, the passive end is moved back until some of the slack is taken up in the line. That way, lifts as long as Slide Brook don't have to be respliced simply because they run out of carriage travel.
#40
Posted 08 June 2005 - 10:40 AM
ZackyJeff, on May 30 2005, 02:51 PM, said:
Well, I can take a guess on the shortest one: The "First Time" Express at Park City, UT.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sorry but no. The shortest is the Legacy express at COP, Calgary, Alberta
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











