Jump to content


1st Hsq In World Found!


  • You cannot reply to this topic
71 replies to this topic

#41 Tinel

    New User

  • Member
  • 5 Posts:

Posted 26 November 2003 - 10:26 AM

Chains were used (in Switzerland) by:
Garaventa
WSO-Staedelilift
(Baco-)Poma
von Roll
Habegger
Giovanola & frères
Muellerlifts (GMD)
Rowema

#42 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 26 November 2003 - 11:57 PM

I think everyone used chains before they found a reliable way to get the tyres to take the carrier around the contour
Zack

#43 Eric

    Established User

  • Member
  • 252 Posts:

Posted 27 November 2003 - 07:56 AM

yep
-ERIC

#44 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 27 November 2003 - 10:11 AM

Another picture of the lift.

Attached File(s)


- Cameron

#45 Eric

    Established User

  • Member
  • 252 Posts:

Posted 27 November 2003 - 11:02 AM

Is that at Brek ?
-ERIC

#46 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 27 November 2003 - 11:05 AM

I don't know.
- Cameron

#47 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 27 November 2003 - 11:31 AM

Looks alright, good for its age
Zack

#48 Eric

    Established User

  • Member
  • 252 Posts:

Posted 27 November 2003 - 11:52 AM

That doesn't look like the first HSQ found in the world
-ERIC

#49 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 27 November 2003 - 11:54 AM

I wasn't sure, but it does look old.
- Cameron

#50 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 27 November 2003 - 05:34 PM

That pic is not from Breck. I'm 100% sure that is not breck.
Jeff

#51 Dr Frankenstein

    C.S.I.A. Level 1

  • Member
  • 436 Posts:
  • Interests:Computers, skiing

Posted 28 November 2003 - 02:12 PM

Not the same grips, not the same towers, not the same chairs, it's not this lift. :blink:

#52 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,918 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 28 November 2003 - 03:25 PM

Conveyor chains were the first method of moving chairs around the contour, as Cameron noted. I don't know how maintenance-intensive Doppelmayr's are, but Poma's take a week per terminal to work on in the summer. Then there's the small problem of the cadencing system being a 'passive' system, instead of the more modern 'active' tyre banks. A passive system means that the chair comes into the terminal and either is caught by the chain or not. An active system, on the other hand, constantly fine-tunes the spacing of the carriers as they come through, eliminating (or almost) chair collisions.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#53 Dr Frankenstein

    C.S.I.A. Level 1

  • Member
  • 436 Posts:
  • Interests:Computers, skiing

Posted 14 January 2004 - 02:15 PM

Does the Orange (formerly Quicksilver) chairlift have gravity grips????

#54 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 29 February 2004 - 05:30 PM

I dont think so. I think it had the box-style grip in use until about '94 (?).
(no actual info on this, don't hold me to it)
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#55 Dr Frankenstein

    C.S.I.A. Level 1

  • Member
  • 436 Posts:
  • Interests:Computers, skiing

Posted 14 March 2004 - 04:37 PM

It's not DS grips.

#56 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,918 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 14 March 2004 - 07:20 PM

The former Quicksilver doesn't have DS grips? It must have been retrofitted, then, because the DS grip was the first detachable grip and it was on the Quicksilver when it was at Breckenridge,
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#57 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 15 March 2004 - 05:46 AM

The chain spacing system on the older Doppelmayrs like at Vail looks pretty simple. The chair is caught by two sort of hook things that are spaced out as far as the distance between the chairs should be. The chains catch the chair. But what would happen if one of them missed the chain hooks and the next one crashed into it?
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#58 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 15 March 2004 - 09:58 AM

We discussed this a while back with the POMA Angel terminals. If the lift operator was able to see that the chair missed and stopped the lift in time, he would be able to put it on the rail, but if he missed , well there would be a problem. Doppelmayr's seem not to have this problem from what I have seen.
- Cameron

#59 Dr Frankenstein

    C.S.I.A. Level 1

  • Member
  • 436 Posts:
  • Interests:Computers, skiing

Posted 15 March 2004 - 06:38 PM

The operator at St-Sauveur was going crazy because he didn't wanted to stop the lift! He was running in all the ways!

#60 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 16 March 2004 - 04:13 PM

SkiBachelor, on Mar 15 2004, 12:58 PM, said:

We discussed this a while back with the POMA Angel terminals. If the lift operator was able to see that the chair missed and stopped the lift in time, he would be able to put it on the rail, but if he missed , well there would be a problem. Doppelmayr's seem not to have this problem from what I have seen.

Do you mean he would put it on the maintainance rail and put it back next time the spot came around, or push it back into the chains that it missed?
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet





2 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users