Jump to content


Snowmass to get a Six pack and 8 Pax Gondola


65 replies to this topic

#41 boardski

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 760 Posts:

Posted 03 October 2005 - 02:24 PM

I was not able to get the actual improvements map to enlarge so I can see all the detail, I wass mainly going by the lift changes which were written in the plan which did not specifically say the Coney Glade chair is coming down.
A question though: With the shortened Burlingame lift, can you still ride it to reach Sam's Knob. Does it still unload high enough? It did not sound as if it did.
Skiing since 1977, snowboarding since 1989

#42 poloxskier

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 1,626 Posts:

Posted 03 October 2005 - 10:07 PM

From what it looks like on the map and what I remember from skiing there it will not be possible to get to the knob from burlingame anymore.
-Bryan

Theres a place for all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.

"You could say that a mountain is alot like a woman, once you think you know every inch of her and you're about to dip your skis into some soft, deep powder...Bam, you've got two broken legs, cracked ribs and you pay your $20 just to let her punch your lift ticket all over again"

#43 boardski

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 760 Posts:

Posted 04 October 2005 - 06:58 AM

With Burlingame not unloading high enough to reach the knob and with Alpine Springs only unloading high enough to reach Sheer Bliss and not Big Burn, the Coney Glade HSQ still has many uses. It also will make it possible for intermediate and advanced skiers and riders who park over at Two Creeks to traverse accross the mountain and access Big Burn and the Knob quickly without skiing down to the bottom of the HSS. It will be interesting how they will manage the traffic down there (at the bottom of Village Express) . It has historically been a zoo with skiers and riders of all abilities everywhere when one skis any lower than Burlingame. Since the removal of the Glade is not mentioned as definate in the master plan, hopefully they will reconsider. We'll have to wait and see. It will be interesting to see the effects of the changes. BTW, the lift to the left of the Elk Camp looks like it will open up some cool terrain. I think that area is mostly gladed now. A high speed replacement for the Funnel lift has also much needed and that Gondola will be nice. It is a hassle and-a-half unloading a toddler on a teather from a center-bar chair with an olympic downhill course for an unloading ramp. The indoor waterpark also sounds very unique and should draw many visitors. Even though it probably sounds as if I am "grumbling", I do recognize many positive parts of the upcoming projects.
Skiing since 1977, snowboarding since 1989

#44 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 04 October 2005 - 08:15 AM

I wonder if Snowmass has plans of replacing Coney Glade and Big Burn with new HSQs like what happened with Ajax Express at Aspen Mountain?
- Cameron

#45 skiersage

    SAM student

  • Administrator I
  • 858 Posts:

Posted 04 October 2005 - 03:28 PM

hey guys, I got an email about the coney glade/big burn idea. it sounds like coney glade will be a backup and will not be removed.

Quote

Part of the rumor is true. In two seasons the Big Burn Chair is slated to be replaced. It will follow the same alignment, but might terminate higher up the Burn.



There are no plans to replace the Coney Glade Chair. It will not run everyday, but will be a parallel chair similar to Burlingame or Naked Lady that operates for special events and during the busiest periods.



Hope this clears things up for you.



Cheers,



Rich Burkley

General Manger, Mountain Operations

Aspen Skiing Company
:biggrin: :thumbsup:
-Sage


If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And then find someone whose life is giving them vodka and have a party.
-Ron White

#46 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 04 October 2005 - 03:35 PM

I guess they decided to keep it after 2 months of thinking about it.
- Cameron

#47 boardski

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 760 Posts:

Posted 05 October 2005 - 07:45 AM

That sounds like a good plan. Then they will still have the lift if they need it to clear the bottleneck at the bottom of Village Express. I kind of wish they would have the new Burn chair originate at the bottom of Sheer Bliss (and remove the Bliss) but there might not be enough room for a HSQ or HSS terminal there. The current Burn chair could then be used for back-up also. I like the idea of the Burn chair unloading higher up though. Maybe one will be able to access some of the Cirque trails without the long line for the poma-tow.
Skiing since 1977, snowboarding since 1989

#48 skiersage

    SAM student

  • Administrator I
  • 858 Posts:

Posted 06 October 2005 - 11:34 AM

more news from aspen:
we now have some pictures of new lift stuff
Attached File  DeepTemerityCement.jpg (556.35K)
Number of downloads: 26
first one is of the cement for the top terminal being poured
Attached File  DeepTHeli.jpg (955.74K)
Number of downloads: 30
second is one of the towers being helicoptered in.
Attached File  DeepTHeli2.jpg (711.56K)
Number of downloads: 29
this one is of a tower that has been flown in and is attached to the foundation
Attached File  village_express.jpg (515.08K)
Number of downloads: 44
the last one is of the lift line for the village express. you can also see that the fanny hill express is totally gone. you can also see just how much they shortened burlingame. alot more than I expected anyway. it also looks like the burlingame chair has an alpha terminal. probably off of the old fanny hill chair.
-Sage


If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And then find someone whose life is giving them vodka and have a party.
-Ron White

#49 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,076 Posts:

Posted 06 October 2005 - 06:25 PM

Nice flixs with the fall colors of Colorado included!!!
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#50 vons

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 940 Posts:

Posted 27 November 2005 - 02:26 PM

skied snowmass today, the six-pack is running at reduced speed per tramway board's orders untill an other tower can be added to the line. Seems that an e-stop at full speed causes chais to hit the roof of a snowmaking building (due to line bounce a normal condition expereanced on all lifts). I was told that the tower will be added this season befor x-mass. I would worn that this is not a major F___up mostlikly the servey used for design did not have the building marked or it was simply missed, also rope dynamics are a little tricky to predict and there for it may have been thought to have enough clearance. The pulse gondola is without a rope or com lines otherwise up. When completed the lift will be a bottom tension, top drive. The drive is a vult with a single mast holding the bullweel and break assemblies(installed) and a drive shaft (yet to be installed) coming out of the motor room and connecting directly to the bullweel. Fogot my camera today will post pictures at a later date.

#51 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 27 November 2005 - 03:52 PM

Just how slow are they running the lift?
Jeff

#52 coskibum

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 596 Posts:
  • Interests:Skiing, Running, Mountain Biking, Baseball, Hiking, ski history, and Chairlifts.

Posted 27 November 2005 - 03:55 PM

oops...does anyone have any pictures. snowmass won't be the same without fanny hill!

#53 vons

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 940 Posts:

Posted 27 November 2005 - 05:24 PM

under 750 fpm

#54 Kicking Horse

    Established User

  • Industry I
  • 3,071 Posts:
  • Interests:Chairlifts

Posted 27 November 2005 - 09:26 PM

how were the lines?

This post has been edited by Kicking Horse: 27 November 2005 - 10:17 PM

Jeff

#55 vons

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 940 Posts:

Posted 28 November 2005 - 09:23 PM

not bad on sunday most people ski bigburn lift and only use the six to get up first thing

#56 boardski

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 760 Posts:

Posted 30 November 2005 - 01:34 PM

Sort of a comical visual comes to mind thinking back to those skiing comic strips and posters I have seen, I'm sure anything but comical for the management and lift maintenance staff though. How long will the lift need to be shut down to install the extra tower anyway?? Since Wood Run was removed, does this leave skiers and riders any other lift to ride out of the village base area??
Skiing since 1977, snowboarding since 1989

#57 Lift Dinosaur

    Established User

  • Industry II
  • 2,076 Posts:

Posted 30 November 2005 - 04:29 PM

View Postboardski, on Nov 30 2005, 02:34 PM, said:

Sort of a comical visual comes to mind thinking back to those skiing comic strips and posters I have seen, I'm sure anything but comical for the management and lift maintenance staff though. How long will the lift need to be shut down to install the extra tower anyway?? Since Wood Run was removed, does this leave skiers and riders any other lift to ride out of the village base area??

The lift is still running during the day - 11.5 minute ride as opposed to a 9.5 minute ride at full speed. All of the work is being done at night. Last night they dozed the snow off of the trail, brought in a pumper and 2 concrete trucks, poured the foundation, and dozed and groomed the snow back onto the trail. Lift opened at its normal time. Tower work will be done the same -"All under the cover of darkness!"
"Things turn out best for the people that make the best of the way things turn out." A.L.

#58 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,918 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 01 December 2005 - 05:25 AM

Another late-night project... would this be considered a service project under Rod or is it still tasked to the install guys?
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#59 SidBurn

    Established User

  • Member
  • 64 Posts:

Posted 20 December 2005 - 09:40 AM

I hope they don't replace the Silver Queen's cars. It is an iconic lift because of its unique design and Aspen wouldn't be the same if its gondola looked like everyone elses.

#60 skiersage

    SAM student

  • Administrator I
  • 858 Posts:

Posted 20 December 2005 - 09:47 AM

View PostSidBurn, on Dec 20 2005, 12:40 PM, said:

I hope they don't replace the Silver Queen's cars. It is an iconic lift because of its unique design and Aspen wouldn't be the same if its gondola looked like everyone elses.


They say that they are going to replace the cabins on the silver queen next year but it remains to be seen if they actually do or not. Right now what I am wondering is what the new cabins would look like. I'm not sure if they will use ones like everyone else or if they will use ones hat are comprable to the ones that are currently on the lift.

BTW: Does anyone know if the new lift at snowmas has a full midstation or does it have a half one like at buttermilk? also is the sams nob restaraunt still therte or was it removed to make room for the new lift?

This post has been edited by skiersage: 20 December 2005 - 09:50 AM

-Sage


If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And then find someone whose life is giving them vodka and have a party.
-Ron White





2 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users