FCC
#1
Posted 12 October 2004 - 09:07 PM
Thats just my opinion, but how do you guys feel?
#2
Posted 12 October 2004 - 09:16 PM
#3
Posted 12 October 2004 - 09:39 PM
But what really ticks me off about the FCC is ever since the costume failure at the super bowl, the FCC has banned even more words like bitch, hoe, etc. but someway skeet was able to slip the words to ban.
I agree with Zack about how if someone doesn't like what they hear or see on tv or the radio to just turn it off or change the station. No one is forcing them to listen to the broadcast, but people in these days don't want to take responsible for their own actions.
But what I think is funny is how it's prohibited to say sh!t on the air when only words that make sexual relations are prohibited.
#4
Posted 13 October 2004 - 08:12 AM
#7 Guest_altaskier_*
Posted 13 October 2004 - 10:53 AM
This post has been edited by altaskier: 13 October 2004 - 11:05 AM
#8
Posted 13 October 2004 - 12:51 PM
Seems like only the FCC cared about the Fox thing. Janet Jackson was all over the news after it happened, and they weren't fined as much as Fox is being fined. Did anyone hear anything about what Fox did?
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
#9
Posted 13 October 2004 - 12:59 PM
Another funny thing I found on the internet a month after the super bowl thing was that the FCC was going to try to moderate cable television too. I just don't understand why the FCC has to moderate the public airwaves when there are only like 4 networks pretty much that use those airwaves while most people in the United States have cable or satellite television, which can go un-moderated.
I think us American should vote on this and throw in a late ballot measure to say if we want the FCC to monitor the airwaves or not. :)
#10
Posted 13 October 2004 - 01:27 PM
The rules are clear, and there are many of those who keep pushing the limit to see what they can do and the FCC is now drawing the line and making those who cross the line pay the price. Having standards is not a bad thing.......when you get older and have kids you will understand.
#11
Posted 13 October 2004 - 02:54 PM
#12
Posted 13 October 2004 - 03:27 PM
I'm not saying that listen listening to explicit language at a young age will make you a better person or whatever, but if kids did hear explicit language at a younger age, they probably would respect it more and know what it ment rather than learning one of those words when your older and saying it freely because it's a bad word.
#14
Posted 13 October 2004 - 08:26 PM
i dont know if i worded this right, i hope you all know what i mean.
#15
Posted 14 October 2004 - 03:33 AM
My take on the CRTC, via Edmontonguy and altaskier: When I lived in Bellingham the only broadcast stations we got via 'PeasantVison' were those from Vancouver- Global, BCTV, CBC, et cetera. We also listened to CFOX, Rock 101 and such on the radio. After five or six years of Canadian broadcasting I got so used to not hearing songs censored or shows moved to cable that it was a bit of a shock when I moved to Colorado and suddenly everything is censored again. An example: 'What It's Like' by Everlast. I first heard the song on CFOX, with no beeps or clever substitutions entered. Now when I hear it, there's a part of the song that you only hear every other word because it relates to being called a whore or shooting somewone with your Colt .45.
#16
Posted 14 October 2004 - 03:35 AM
NWS, on Oct 13 2004, 10:02 AM, said:
If you want interesting reading, read about the Patriot Act after 9/11. We as Americans lost some of our rights in exchange for national security.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Don't get me started. How that got around the Supreme Court is beyond me, since it seems to violate several parts of the Constitution. How can we lose rights when they were enshrined in law over two hundred years ago?
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











