←  Skilifts.org Images

Skilifts.org / SORT Forum

»

Quicksilver Express Accident

seilbahnbilder.ch's Photo seilbahnbilder.ch 06 Jul 2009

Quote

Polar X grips


What kind of grips are these?

In Spain there is still a NOT retrofitted Yan HSQ in operation!
http://www.remontees...rtage-1057.html
This post has been edited by seilbahnbilder.ch: 06 July 2009 - 11:40 AM
Reply

Lift Kid's Photo Lift Kid 06 Jul 2009

Quote

In Spain there is still a NOT retrofitted Yan HSQ in operation!
http://www.remontees...rtage-1057.html


Please remember that climate had a lot to do with the Quicksilver accident. The climate at that ski area in Spain could be very different from Canada. I am not entirely familiar with the climate in that area, but it is probable that it isn't affecting the marshmallow springs as severely as Canada's climate. Also, remember that there were many of these lifts operating all over North America and elsewhere at the time of the Quicksilver incident, none of which failed catastrophically like Quicksilver.
Reply

SkiBachelor's Photo SkiBachelor 06 Jul 2009

View PostLift Kid, on 06 July 2009 - 01:10 PM, said:

Please remember that climate had a lot to do with the Quicksilver accident. The climate at that ski area in Spain could be very different from Canada. I am not entirely familiar with the climate in that area, but it is probable that it isn't affecting the marshmallow springs as severely as Canada's climate. Also, remember that there were many of these lifts operating all over North America and elsewhere at the time of the Quicksilver incident, none of which failed catastrophically like Quicksilver.


The Quicksilver Express at Whistler was the only YAN HSQ with the Type 11 grip and had a very steep section. However, there were never any report incidents involving the Type 7 grip, which is what the other YAN HSQs used.
Reply

Lift Kid's Photo Lift Kid 06 Jul 2009

What were the differences between the two grips? What made the 11 so different from the 7?
Reply

skiersage's Photo skiersage 06 Jul 2009

View PostLift Kid, on 06 July 2009 - 01:10 PM, said:

Please remember that climate had a lot to do with the Quicksilver accident.


Climate had nothing to do with it. Here is a list of factors that contributed to the accident:
The failed carrier was on the steepest section of the lift.
The accident occurred on the down line as oppose to the up line, this brings gravity into the equation.
The carrier had passengers on it which added mass.
The lift was outfitted with bubbles which means more weight.
The accident occurred during an abrupt stop.
The marshmallow springs used didn't provide as much force as the metal springs used by other lift companies.

Another thing to keep in mind is Newton's first law of motion, which is: "Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it." Similarly when the lift came to a sudden stop, the carriers naturally wanted to continue moving forward. In this case the forward momentum of the carriers plus the pull of gravity was enough to overcome the force of the grip. This caused the grip to slide down the cable and thus the quicksilver accident occurred.

View PostLift Kid, on 06 July 2009 - 06:16 PM, said:

What were the differences between the two grips? What made the 11 so different from the 7?


Yan type 11
Here is a picture of a grip from the quicksilver lift.
compare this with the yan type 7
Reply

Lift Kid's Photo Lift Kid 06 Jul 2009

I recall reading that the climate made the rubber springs brittle, therefore even less force.
Reply

skier2's Photo skier2 06 Jul 2009

View PostLift Kid, on 06 July 2009 - 07:44 PM, said:

I recall reading that the climate made the rubber springs brittle, therefore even less force.

Yes, I have read the official accident report several times and recall distinctly the severe and abrupt changes in temperature at Whistler as being a contributing factor to the weakness of the grip force. Still, this is only a fraction of the cause, as the lift also had too steep a profile for the design and a faulty e-stop alarm.
Reply

skiersage's Photo skiersage 06 Jul 2009

View PostLift Kid, on 06 July 2009 - 07:44 PM, said:

I recall reading that the climate made the rubber springs brittle, therefore even less force.


Colder temperatures make all materials less resilient. I would think that all spring powered chair grips lose force as the temps drop. As to whether temperature has a profound effect on rubber I don't know. But one thing I know was stated was that the marshmallow springs had less grip force to begin with.
Reply

seilbahnbilder.ch's Photo seilbahnbilder.ch 07 Jul 2009

Thanks for the very interessting information!

Is the chairlift in Spain equipped with Yan 7 grips? And what is the siginficant difference between Yan 7 and 11? I can't see a huge difference?!
Reply

SkiBachelor's Photo SkiBachelor 07 Jul 2009

The Type 11 was designed for heavier loads, just like the Doppelmayr DT-104 vs. DT-106.
Reply

liftmech's Photo liftmech 10 Jul 2009

View Postseilbahnbilder.ch, on 06 July 2009 - 11:39 AM, said:

What kind of grips are these?

In Spain there is still a NOT retrofitted Yan HSQ in operation!
http://www.remontees...rtage-1057.html


You mean 'Pol-X', not Polar-X. That refers to a company that redesigned the YAN-7 for more reliable use. They addressed the issues which contributed to the originals being pulled from service, like the rubber marshmallow springs and the rope size inserts. Ultimately the redesigned grips were used only on two? installations, both in Alberta. Every other L/E detach in North America was retrofitted by Doppelmayr or Poma, or replaced entirely.
Reply

mikest2's Photo mikest2 10 Jul 2009

View Postliftmech, on 10 July 2009 - 05:39 AM, said:

You mean 'Pol-X', not Polar-X. That refers to a company that redesigned the YAN-7 for more reliable use. They addressed the issues which contributed to the originals being pulled from service, like the rubber marshmallow springs and the rope size inserts. Ultimately the redesigned grips were used only on two? installations, both in Alberta. Every other L/E detach in North America was retrofitted by Doppelmayr or Poma, or replaced entirely.

Silver Star's two Yans were also retrofitted at the same time as Lake Louise's
Reply

liftmech's Photo liftmech 18 Jul 2009

Ah, forgot about those ones. Are they still there? I seem to recall one of them had a heavy-side-only midstation.
Reply

mikest2's Photo mikest2 18 Jul 2009

View Postliftmech, on 18 July 2009 - 05:34 AM, said:

Ah, forgot about those ones. Are they still there? I seem to recall one of them had a heavy-side-only midstation.

No, they were replaced when Silver Star was bought by our group.
Reply

skiersage's Photo skiersage 18 Jul 2009

My Linkhttp://www.polxwest.com/YnGrip.htm
For reference, link to Pol-X chair grip web page.
Reply

Skier123's Photo Skier123 26 Aug 2009

View PostKZ, on 19 November 2003 - 08:49 AM, said:

Yep, and becasue of the accidents and lawsuits, Lift Engineering went out of business, and now there are only 2 lift makers. Kinda sad if you ask me


Lift Engineering should've just stuck with fixed grips.
Reply

Emax's Photo Emax 26 Aug 2009

View PostSkier123, on 26 August 2009 - 05:39 AM, said:

Lift Engineering should've just stuck with fixed grips.


Amen
Reply

mthornton's Photo mthornton 26 Aug 2009

Quoting Artur Doppelmayr, 1997

I would have taken his ideas, but then, I would send them to my engineers.
Reply

EagleAce's Photo EagleAce 27 Oct 2009

View PostSkier123, on 26 August 2009 - 05:39 AM, said:

Lift Engineering should've just stuck with fixed grips.


Amen X2! I've always liked the simplicity of his fixed-grips.
Reply

Skier123's Photo Skier123 13 Mar 2010

Am I the only one who can no longer see the pictures on this post?
Reply