

Possible Lifts for Summer 2009
#81
Posted 16 November 2008 - 09:54 AM
"Today's problems cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." -Albert Einstein
#82
Posted 16 November 2008 - 10:30 AM
skierdude9450, on Nov 16 2008, 09:54 AM, said:
Cool, I was disappointed when my wife and I went to New York a couple of years ago, just days after the big tram breakdown. We stayed with friends in one of the apartment buildings right next to the tram on Roosevelt Island.
#83
Posted 16 November 2008 - 01:48 PM
Liftblog.com
#84
Posted 16 November 2008 - 03:01 PM
Skier, on Nov 16 2008, 04:48 PM, said:
It happens all the time in design/build scenarios. If you don't give your contractors specific instruction you end up with two totally different products, and when your dealing with the government all they care about is dollar signs.
#85
Posted 16 November 2008 - 09:12 PM
#86
Posted 17 November 2008 - 07:17 AM
vonrollskyway1, on Nov 16 2008, 10:12 PM, said:
I think they want to do a full replacement after the major breakdown that it had. Yes Von Rolls are great machines however they do age and need replacement.
#87
Posted 17 November 2008 - 11:30 AM
Fixed Grip Quad, 200 HP; 1852 Slope Length; 788 Vertical; 1240pph initial capacity; 450fpm; 43 carriers.
Dino
skierdude9450, on Nov 9 2008, 02:56 PM, said:
Actually 47%
slope % = vertical / horizontal (not slope length)
#88
Posted 30 November 2008 - 03:26 PM
This post has been edited by garthd: 30 November 2008 - 03:26 PM
#92
Posted 01 January 2009 - 11:58 AM
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
KTVB
BOISE - Sun Valley is moving forward on its plans for a gondola.
The resort announced today it will begin construction on an 8-passenger fully enclosed gondola as soon as spring weather permits.
It is similar to one currently in operation at Heavenly in Lake Tahoe.
The gondola will take skiers from River Run to the Roundhouse restaraunt some 2,000 feet up Bald Mountain.
It is expected to be completed in time for the 2009-2010 ski season.
Liftblog.com
#93
Posted 01 January 2009 - 12:37 PM
#94
Posted 01 January 2009 - 04:30 PM
Ritchie503, on Jan 1 2009, 12:37 PM, said:
Meanwhile, Lutsen will most likely be snubbed yet again...
#95
Posted 01 January 2009 - 07:58 PM
skier2, on Jan 1 2009, 06:30 PM, said:
I heard they are talking about putting in the other half of Naked Lady... I thought I heard about them saving the extra towers and chairs to install with a new drive and return as a completely separate lift.
I can't see Lutsen getting a high speed anytime soon though.
#96
Posted 01 January 2009 - 09:32 PM
skier2, on Jan 1 2009, 05:30 PM, said:
Well yes but Granite Peak is much closer to attract the Chicago crowd.
I don't think Lusten will get a high speed lift in the near future. If they were to get one were do you think they would put it or where do you think the most logical spot to put it is? I would think they would put it over on Moose Mountain.
#97
Posted 02 January 2009 - 09:09 AM
Ritchie503, on Jan 1 2009, 10:32 PM, said:
I don't think Lusten will get a high speed lift in the near future. If they were to get one were do you think they would put it or where do you think the most logical spot to put it is? I would think they would put it over on Moose Mountain.
I think that they would either replace the crumbling Caribou chair or run a new line between the Bull Chair and Caribou Chair, since it wouldn't make sense to remove the Bull Chair and replace that, since it serves only 2/3 of Moose Mountain. If they totally remove Caribou, they will likely reuse it elsewhere. Bridge Chair also needs an upgrade, though, and I can see them replacing that with a larger-capacity fixed grip, perhaps even the other half of Naked Lady. There is also talk of a lift on the back side of Moose, which could also be a use for the other half of Naked Lady, or the Caribou chair, if they removed it.
Also, since they have installed the Naked Lady Chair, I see no need for the aging Muller Eagle Mountain Chair, since it serves the same terrain plus Brule Run. Losing that chair would clean up the mountain from a visual perspective, and they could always run a second catwalk below the current one that serves Eagle Ridge so that more of Brule Run could remain open. There used to be one, but it eroded away due to improper care years ago. Really, there are limitless possibilities. I might attach a map later showing some of these.
#98
Posted 02 January 2009 - 09:16 AM
Ritchie503, on Jan 1 2009, 11:32 PM, said:
I don't think Lusten will get a high speed lift in the near future. If they were to get one were do you think they would put it or where do you think the most logical spot to put it is? I would think they would put it over on Moose Mountain.
The logical spot for me would be to replace a chair on Moose. Considering traffic flow on Moose I would say the Bull chair would be the best location.
#99
Posted 24 January 2009 - 05:39 PM
http://www.fobmi.org/Lift.htm
Liftblog.com
5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users