

What Is The Steepest Lift?
#41
Posted 25 February 2004 - 10:52 AM
The Gold Hill Lift at Telluride has a 1,475' vertical rise over a 3,333' horizontal length = 44.25%. The steepest segment of that lift's profile is of course much steeper.
I think there is some practical limitation to the steepest portion of a profile - maybe 45 degrees or 100.00% slope angle. At some point the steepness of a lift has to be mitigated by lengthing the hanger length so that the carrier does not impact the rope with a 15 degree backswing. This of course applies to the steepest section of the profile, usually the area directly downhill of a tower due to static and dynamic carrier loading.
#42
Posted 25 February 2004 - 09:57 PM

here's another shot:

This post has been edited by jibij: 25 February 2004 - 09:59 PM
#43
Posted 26 February 2004 - 08:16 AM
#45
Posted 26 February 2004 - 11:08 AM
#46
Posted 26 February 2004 - 11:43 AM
#49
Posted 26 February 2004 - 04:46 PM
bramat, on Jan 26 2004, 10:12 PM, said:
Here are the stats for the Beaver Lake Chair as they were before its removal.
Type = Riblet Double / 1969
Rise = 300'
Length = 959'
Slope Length = 1,005'
Ave Grade = 31%
Capacity = 1,200/hr
Spacing = 40'
Speed = 400fpm
I believe the average grade looks so low because the lift goes over flat (lake) before it hits the steep rise. Looking over the stats for the Beaver Lake trail it shows the max vertical as 72% and this is the steepest run at West (compare to triple-60 at 65% grade).
FYI
#50
Posted 27 February 2004 - 08:02 PM
KZ, on Jan 20 2004, 06:29 PM, said:
Jumping back a few posts:
Riblet used only four sheaves per tower to allow for steeper tower angles. Tony Sowder (Doug's father) had a design philosophy wherein the sheave angle relative to the tower tube was as close to 90 degrees as possible, so he didn't want a great deal of weight up on the cap. As Riblet progressed to building triples and then quads, it became necessary to build towers with eight sheaves due to increased loads. (I was told by Doug that it would be not impossible, but difficult to build a six-sheave Riblet assembly.) If you ride Riblets a lot, you'll notice that the only eight-sheave assemblies are the newer rectangle-box ones rather than the older squashed-tube or the really old triangular box. A clarification- I refer to the number of support or depression sheaves on a tower, not the total including combo sheaves. There are some Riblet assemblies with a total of twelve sheaves, but that includes four combo sheaves. Tower 1 on Baker's C-8 has a combo with 16 depression and 8 support- the most I've seen on any lift.
#51
Posted 29 February 2004 - 05:37 PM
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
#54
Posted 04 September 2004 - 03:30 PM
Powdr, on Apr 27 2004, 08:18 AM, said:
Powdr
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes I have, I've been very curious about the Bridal Veil Tram since I first moved to Utah. Here is the info that I’ve found. It was a sightseeing tram that lead up to a restaurant on the cliff. The lower station was destroyed by an avalanche on January 31, 1996. What the avalanche didn't destroy has since been destroyed by vandals. It is (was) the “world’s steepest aerial tram” according to the words painted inside what's left of the motor room. What I’ve heard was that it was not insured against such an accident hence it has not been rebuilt. Getting to the top station is on my list of things to do some day. Also just found a site saying it's for sale, the waterfall and what’s left of the tram. It's a bit of a fixer upper but for the true lift enthusiast the chance of a life time. Now all I need is $3.4 million
http://www.tomheal.c...cial/bridal.htm
#58
Posted 06 September 2004 - 11:59 AM
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet
#60
Posted 14 October 2004 - 09:52 PM
3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users