

Yan Detachable Grip
Started by KZ, Nov 09 2003 05:39 PM
14 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 10 November 2003 - 02:51 PM
KZ
Grip had compressed rubber as a spring source. At the time it was felt this might be the answer to all of the problems the manufactures were having with large springs. Springs were substituted for rubber in the redesigned grip. Also jaws were enlarged to capture more than 51% of the haul rope. Note the lack of parts that make the grip (this was a key selling point). Is it me or do Doppelmayrs grips look the same?
Algor and Les Ogalik web sites have the detailed information and pictures. Les Ogalik was YAN's v.p. and main mechanical engineer.
The Salt Lake Tribune has a fairly accurate write-up on CETC's owner and history of the company which owes some of its success to YAN , as Doppelmayr and CTEC were major benifactors of YAN replacement lifts.
http://www.algor.com...ift/skilift.asp
http://www.polxwest.com/Les.htm
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Oct/10262003/Bu...ss/Business.asp
Ryan B
Grip had compressed rubber as a spring source. At the time it was felt this might be the answer to all of the problems the manufactures were having with large springs. Springs were substituted for rubber in the redesigned grip. Also jaws were enlarged to capture more than 51% of the haul rope. Note the lack of parts that make the grip (this was a key selling point). Is it me or do Doppelmayrs grips look the same?
Algor and Les Ogalik web sites have the detailed information and pictures. Les Ogalik was YAN's v.p. and main mechanical engineer.
The Salt Lake Tribune has a fairly accurate write-up on CETC's owner and history of the company which owes some of its success to YAN , as Doppelmayr and CTEC were major benifactors of YAN replacement lifts.
http://www.algor.com...ift/skilift.asp
http://www.polxwest.com/Les.htm
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Oct/10262003/Bu...ss/Business.asp
Ryan B
#7
Posted 19 March 2005 - 09:18 PM
Museum piece... better hang on to it or donate it to orangegondola's chairlift history site :) Definitely take some photos, as we've all drawn up half-remembered schematics from one ride years ago but haven't seen one for a while.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.
#8
Posted 20 March 2005 - 04:34 PM
Scroll through this topic, I posted 3 pages from conceptual inputs.
http://www.skilifts....?showtopic=2249
http://www.skilifts....?showtopic=2249
Rob
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#11
Posted 16 August 2005 - 04:03 PM
I presume that many resorts felt that the lifts were probably not safe enough after there were other problems with their HSQs. I know that Lake Louise tried to keep Friendly Giant as long as possible until the government would allow them to continue operating it.
- Cameron
#15
Posted 16 August 2005 - 07:10 PM
When I talked to one of the heads of mountain ops when I was there in May he said that it was getting to that point but it had not reached it yet. The resort chose to remove it due to rising maintenance costs and impending government forced removal.
-Bryan
Theres a place for all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.
"You could say that a mountain is alot like a woman, once you think you know every inch of her and you're about to dip your skis into some soft, deep powder...Bam, you've got two broken legs, cracked ribs and you pay your $20 just to let her punch your lift ticket all over again"
Theres a place for all of God's creatures, right next to the mashed potatoes.
"You could say that a mountain is alot like a woman, once you think you know every inch of her and you're about to dip your skis into some soft, deep powder...Bam, you've got two broken legs, cracked ribs and you pay your $20 just to let her punch your lift ticket all over again"
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users