

Announcement from Whistler Blackcomb
#41
Posted 20 September 2005 - 04:20 PM
#42
Posted 20 September 2005 - 04:48 PM
nathanvg, on Sep 20 2005, 11:13 AM, said:
The new lift doesn't add any new runs. It allows get from one peak to the other more quickly, but you could travel back and forth via the base and enjoy an additional long run.
I agree with Nathanvg here. I would have preferred that they use the money to open up more terrian, like the area west of peak to creek or replace and extend Crystal chair.
#43
Posted 20 September 2005 - 05:27 PM
#44
Posted 20 September 2005 - 05:29 PM
Liftblog.com
#45
Posted 20 September 2005 - 05:33 PM
#46
Posted 20 September 2005 - 05:37 PM
Another reason why W-B is probably planning on installing a 3S rope gondola is because there are plans to expand the Creekside Village and this will make it easier for people to access Blackcomb.
#47
Posted 20 September 2005 - 07:24 PM
#48
Posted 20 September 2005 - 08:22 PM
As for creekside, there are long term plans for more lifts and terrain. I don't know what the schedule might be though. The new lift will improve access to Blackcomb from the South end of town. (Creekside)
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#49
Posted 21 September 2005 - 10:55 AM
Rob- I envy your crew for some reason. That lift will certainly be unique.
#50
Posted 21 September 2005 - 06:34 PM
#52
Posted 22 September 2005 - 03:35 AM
nathanvg, on Sep 20 2005, 04:24 PM, said:
I don't know how much it costed ASC to put in the Slide Brook Express at Sugarbush, but I know it must have cost a pretty penny to build an 11,000 foot long HSQ that goes over three ridges. If this list will be anything like that, the ride will be spectacular!
Your Northeastern US Representative
#53
Posted 22 September 2005 - 05:18 AM
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#54
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:50 AM
What an incredible F*@king waste of money. How could anyone ever justify spending that kind of money on a link lift? Think of what could be done on the mountains instead with $40-50 mil. Thats 4-5 gondis, 15-20 HSQs. Good god, get a grip of yourselves and rethink this decision.
Out,
Powdr
EDIT: Add in the shear fear of height factor and you will have considerably lower usage than expected.
This post has been edited by Powdr: 22 September 2005 - 09:52 AM
#55
Posted 22 September 2005 - 10:24 AM
Powdr, on Sep 22 2005, 10:50 AM, said:
What an incredible F*@king waste of money. How could anyone ever justify spending that kind of money on a link lift? Think of what could be done on the mountains instead with $40-50 mil. Thats 4-5 gondis, 15-20 HSQs. Good god, get a grip of yourselves and rethink this decision.
Out,
Powdr
EDIT: Add in the shear fear of height factor and you will have considerably lower usage than expected.
You have to relize that this $40,000,000 price tag is in Canadian dollars which is $34,178,284.09 in U.S. You would be lucky if you could install 7 high-speed quads or 2 gondolas for that price at Whistler. The vertical there is crazy and I wouldn't expect W-B to replace any of their old high-speed quads (Wizard, Solar Coaster and 7th Heaven) with new lifts when they still run great. Of course Intrawest could have invested the money for this new lift at some of its other resorts, but with the Olympics coming up, you would be amazed at how fast a lift like this could pay for itself in just tourism.
The only other lift that Whistler-Blackcomb needs to replace is Crystal and I think the mountain will be set for a while.
BTW, the Village gondola at Whistler was built at a cost of $20 million back in 1988. Think how much that lift would cost today with inflation.
Cameron
#58
Posted 22 September 2005 - 07:15 PM
Ray's Rule for Precision - Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe.
#60
Posted 23 September 2005 - 08:24 AM
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users