Jump to content


Random Lift Photos Number Four


  • You cannot reply to this topic
106 replies to this topic

#41 iceberg210

    Bald Eagle Lifts: Defying Gravity

  • Administrator II
  • 1,080 Posts:
  • Interests:42

Posted 24 June 2004 - 08:56 AM

My parents went to Napa Valley for their 24'th aniversery and were kind enough to stop by Mamounth and take a couple pics and pic up a trail map here are the pics...

Attached File(s)


Erik Berg
Bald Eagle Lifts: Defying Gravity
http://www.baldeaglelifts.com

#42 iceberg210

    Bald Eagle Lifts: Defying Gravity

  • Administrator II
  • 1,080 Posts:
  • Interests:42

Posted 24 June 2004 - 08:58 AM

That of course is Broadway Express and I don't know what this gondola is called but if anyone knows it would help. I really like that Yan station design it looks like the back of Big Muskie or any other one of those huge draglines.

Attached File(s)


Erik Berg
Bald Eagle Lifts: Defying Gravity
http://www.baldeaglelifts.com

#43 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 24 June 2004 - 11:21 AM

Its the Panorama Gondola. The yan Brodway was actually originally a Yancake, but when doppelmayr came in to do the retrofits, someone designed those terminal coverings which are on all of the Mammoth owned yan hsq's; Canyon, Brodway, J6 and J7. Boy the place sure lost a bunch of snow in the last few weeks. Fun place, probably the best in California. If you go to the main site, under resorts, mammoth is up with almost every lift covered. I took some more pics over memorial day and those shall be added soon.

http://www.skilifts.org/ca-mammoth.htm
Zack

#44 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 27 June 2004 - 04:25 PM

Was the original top terminal modified by Doppelmayr too, because it's a lot different
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#45 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 28 June 2004 - 11:53 AM

I believe it was but i am not sure. The current building seems very new, or at least the bathrooms and the other stuff. You could check the Mammoth timeline, but otherwise you would probably have to contact them to ask.
Zack

#46 spunkyskier01

    industry trainee

  • Industry II
  • 379 Posts:

Posted 29 June 2004 - 07:09 AM

why is the top terminal of the canyon chair different from all of the other terminals made for the yans at mammoth and june?
Everything is just loop-de-loops and flibertyjibbit

#47 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 29 June 2004 - 10:15 AM

What is the surrounding area like? Maybe they designed it to fit in better with its surroundings?
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#48 spunkyskier01

    industry trainee

  • Industry II
  • 379 Posts:

Posted 29 June 2004 - 11:54 AM

it looks just like were the top of the broadway express lift is,(you can see it from the top of the lift) their are only some trees were there are none at the top of the broadway express.just go into the picture part of this website. it is right there.looks good. http://skilifts.org/ca-mammoth.htm
Everything is just loop-de-loops and flibertyjibbit

#49 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 01 July 2004 - 12:04 AM

Its hard to get a good picture of the top of Broadway, but it has no trees around it, just some massive wind guards. I also wonder why the top of canyon is different, and my most logical guess is that the original terminal had a similar design. It was built in '92, 4 years after Broadway, so they may have not built it as a Yancake. Maybe someone has a better idea, but thats my guess.

Now after looking at some Lake Louise pictures, i came across 2 of the old yan hsq, Top of the World, another yancake (as most are). Looked to be in tip-top shape during its final years.

Attached File(s)

  • Attached File  Top1.jpg (39.74K)
    Number of downloads: 86

Zack

#50 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 01 July 2004 - 12:05 AM

1 more blurry shot looking up the line.

Attached File(s)

  • Attached File  Top2.jpg (33.74K)
    Number of downloads: 48

Zack

#51 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 01 July 2004 - 08:00 AM

None of he original eqipment was used for for the new sixpack but the same liftline was used and the old Yan controlrooms are still used

Attached File(s)



#52 KZ

    Multipurpose Machine

  • Industry II
  • 2,087 Posts:
  • Interests:Howdy folks, Im Zack and I live in California.

Posted 01 July 2004 - 11:27 AM

Thats kinda wierd not replacing the control rooms. Oh well, they actually go pretty nicely with the poma terminal.
Zack

#53 Whistler

    Established User

  • Member
  • 369 Posts:
  • Interests:snowboarding, skiing, swimming, school....just kidding, skateboardin etc etc.

Posted 01 July 2004 - 07:23 PM

All the lake lake louise operator's house's are quite nice. check out how roomy the top of the world bottom termianl one is.

#54 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 02 July 2004 - 10:07 PM

Actually, if you look closely at the six packs supports, those are Yan's and not LP's terminal support design. :)
- Cameron

#55 snowboardguy

    Established User

  • Member
  • 180 Posts:
  • Interests:SNOW

Posted 03 July 2004 - 06:40 PM

I've also always wondered why the top terminal of Canyon Express at mammoth is so defferant then any other terminal there. It's just like a big black rectangle

#56 floridaskier

    Established User

  • Administrator I
  • 2,814 Posts:

Posted 04 July 2004 - 04:50 AM

Are you sure those are Yan supports on the terminal? There's probably not much of a chance that they would fit the Poma terminal. But Pomas usually have 3 supports or two fatter ones.
- Tyler
West Palm Beach, FL - elev. 9 feet

#57 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 04 July 2004 - 08:51 AM

Yes I read in SAM that Lake Louise had to reuse the terminal foundations because the banff national park wouldn't allow them to tear them out and replace them with new ones. Just compare those terminal supports with another POMA HSS.
- Cameron

#58 edmontonguy

    Edmontonguy

  • Member
  • 927 Posts:

Posted 04 July 2004 - 09:53 AM

I assume then that the old Tower Foundations were used too. Probably just beefed up a bit as i don't think the Yan ones could have been large enough to support a six pack

#59 liftmech

    lift mechanic

  • Administrator II
  • 5,918 Posts:
  • Interests:Many.

Posted 04 July 2004 - 05:52 PM

That depends- the original TOW lift was a detachable quad, so the towerbases were probably plenty strong. On Poma detaches, the only difference between quad and sixpack towers is the wider sheaves on the sixpacks. Also, tower load partially depends upon rope tension, and Yan stretched the $#!t out of his ropes- way more than Poma does.
Member, Department of Ancient Technology, Colorado chapter.

#60 SkiBachelor

    Forum Administrator

  • Administrator II
  • 6,242 Posts:
  • Interests:Hi, I'm Cameron!

Posted 07 July 2004 - 09:49 PM

Here is a picture I took of the Alpine Springs lift at Aspen's Snowmass resort. The chair rail is sagging pretty bad. :---:

Attached File(s)


- Cameron





1 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users