Rollback at Guduari, Georgia
ceo
16 Mar 2018
Apparently happened this morning, local time. Might be disturbing to watch.
https://www.youtube....h?v=EcPTcQpkso4
https://www.youtube....h?v=EcPTcQpkso4
MNSkier
24 Mar 2018
Here is the latest: https://liftblog.com...dauri-rollback/
Can someone explain to me on a modern Dopp how it one would make an error so grievous that it would cause a rollback? It seems to me that the safety interlock systems would prevent something like this, or the actions would need to be quite deliberate to allow this to happen....
Can someone explain to me on a modern Dopp how it one would make an error so grievous that it would cause a rollback? It seems to me that the safety interlock systems would prevent something like this, or the actions would need to be quite deliberate to allow this to happen....
Aussierob
25 Mar 2018
If you were attempting to operate the lift in Evacuation mode and weren't well trained on the procedures, it's possible to pump the brakes off, and either not know how to reapply them or panic.
2milehi
25 Mar 2018
Typically on most North American Doppelmayrs the "Evac" mover needs two of the three brakes opened manually (Emergency or Service and Rollback). The Evac operator(s) then throttle up the Evac engine and push the lift through the brake. This action tells the operator that the Evac has the load and the Emergency or Service brake can be opened manually).
A lot of the safeties are bypasses in this mode. We practice the Evac on all of our lifts monthly, mechanics and electricians.
Europe could be doing it differently, we'll soon find out.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 25 March 2018 - 11:25 AM
A lot of the safeties are bypasses in this mode. We practice the Evac on all of our lifts monthly, mechanics and electricians.
Europe could be doing it differently, we'll soon find out.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 25 March 2018 - 11:25 AM
Allan
25 Mar 2018
2milehi, on 25 March 2018 - 11:23 AM, said:
Typically on most North American Doppelmayrs the "Evac" mover needs two of the three brakes opened manually (Emergency or Service and Rollback). The Evac operator(s) then throttle up the Evac engine and push the lift through the brake. This action tells the operator that the Evac has the load and the Emergency or Service brake can be opened manually).
A lot of the safeties are bypasses in this mode. We practice the Evac on all of our lifts monthly, mechanics and electricians.
Europe could be doing it differently, we'll soon find out.
A lot of the safeties are bypasses in this mode. We practice the Evac on all of our lifts monthly, mechanics and electricians.
Europe could be doing it differently, we'll soon find out.
This seems odd to me. Our 2007 4CLF Doppelmayr has a fully operational braking system and safety system (running on only the second PLC, so none of the software generated faults) in evac mode. Is this not the norm? Which is similar to the rest of our equipment, with the exception of two lifts that we have to manually open the service brake.
comeagain?
26 Mar 2018
Allan, on 25 March 2018 - 07:25 PM, said:
This seems odd to me. Our 2007 4CLF Doppelmayr has a fully operational braking system and safety system (running on only the second PLC, so none of the software generated faults) in evac mode. Is this not the norm? Which is similar to the rest of our equipment, with the exception of two lifts that we have to manually open the service brake.
The idea of manually bypassing safeties and opening brakes that will not re-close in the event of a rollback seems very strange to me. I can't imagine designing a control system that meant a process that will eventually happen with guests on the lift. Sure, have some provisions in case the PLC explodes in the panel, but as SOP, we're bypassing safety functions?
2milehi
26 Mar 2018
Allan, on 25 March 2018 - 07:25 PM, said:
This seems odd to me. Our 2007 4CLF Doppelmayr has a fully operational braking system and safety system (running on only the second PLC, so none of the software generated faults) in evac mode. Is this not the norm? Which is similar to the rest of our equipment, with the exception of two lifts that we have to manually open the service brake.
Curious, is the PLC in your Doppelmayr an Allen Bradley?
2milehi
26 Mar 2018
comeagain?, on 26 March 2018 - 04:45 PM, said:
The idea of manually bypassing safeties and opening brakes that will not re-close in the event of a rollback seems very strange to me. I can't imagine designing a control system that meant a process that will eventually happen with guests on the lift. Sure, have some provisions in case the PLC explodes in the panel, but as SOP, we're bypassing safety functions?
Not all the safety functions are bypassed. Only tower faults, Emergency stops, and grip profile faults can stop a lift. The Evac is typically only used when the PLC goes south. All of our Doppelmayrs (seven of them) can Evac in reverse so rollbacks are bypassed.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 26 March 2018 - 05:12 PM
Lift Dinosaur
26 Mar 2018
2milehi, on 26 March 2018 - 05:12 PM, said:
Not all the safety functions are bypassed. Only tower faults, Emergency stops, and grip profile faults can stop a lift. The Evac is typically only used when the PLC goes south. All of our Doppelmayrs (seven of them) can Evac in reverse so rollbacks are bypassed.
Sounds like you are talking about your detaches. Is it the same for the Wayback (4CLF)?
Thanks-
Dino
comeagain?
26 Mar 2018
2milehi, on 26 March 2018 - 05:12 PM, said:
Not all the safety functions are bypassed. Only tower faults, Emergency stops, and grip profile faults can stop a lift. The Evac is typically only used when the PLC goes south. All of our Doppelmayrs (seven of them) can Evac in reverse so rollbacks are bypassed.
What's happening to your PLCs that you have to evac the lift?
Allan
26 Mar 2018
2milehi
27 Mar 2018
comeagain?, on 26 March 2018 - 05:33 PM, said:
What's happening to your PLCs that you have to evac the lift?
Two of the three times we've evaced guests off was due to no fault annunciation from the PLC. It is a royal pain in the dick to figure out what the fault is when there is no annunciation.
We have had some close calls with the Pilz PLC having an FS issue. It takes about 20 minutes to pull the stack, decode it, and hunt down the problem. Typically if we can't get a lift going in 20 minutes, the lift is evaced to get the people off.
In the off season I'll mess with the wiring of the clocked signal to paddle switches in the terminal and have the boys chase that issues. It can take them a couple of hours to find my induced fault.
This post has been edited by 2milehi: 27 March 2018 - 07:07 AM
2milehi
27 Mar 2018
Lift Dinosaur
27 Mar 2018
2milehi
27 Mar 2018
Allan, on 26 March 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:
Both of them in the lift are. The evac drive is a small diesel motor that couples to the driveline via a chain coupling.
Sounds like you got the Canadian built lift in that time period (mid 2000s) where St. Jerome went rouge and offered AB PLCs. I recall that Doppelmayr (Austria) in 2008 put that to a stop an only offered Pilz PLCs.
comeagain?
28 Mar 2018
2milehi, on 27 March 2018 - 06:42 AM, said:
Two of the three times we've evaced guests off was due to no fault annunciation from the PLC. It is a royal pain in the dick to figure out what the fault is when there is no annunciation.
We have had some close calls with the Pilz PLC having an FS issue. It takes about 20 minutes to pull the stack, decode it, and hunt down the problem. Typically if we can't get a lift going in 20 minutes, the lift is evaced to get the people off.
In the off season I'll mess with the wiring of the clocked signal to paddle switches in the terminal and have the boys chase that issues. It can take them a couple of hours to find my induced fault.
Wow. Yeah, I'd say that's a good reason to not want people on the lift. And sounds like poor programming if you get faults or something without the PLC actually telling you what.